Abstract
Today the world is still in shock, after the unprecedented decision of President Putin to annex the Crimea territory. Was it Russia’s attempt to awaken its neo-imperialism or a simple case of assertion of national sovereignty? The question posed to the people was now weather a new road to the European Union and the West, or a pursuit of the historic ties with Russia was the right answer? Furthermore, this paper examines the arguments put forward by the alienated Russian doctrine of International Law. I argue, that Russia’s annexation of Crimea was a violation on a range of complex and intricate principles of International Law which serves to guarantee Ukraine’s territorial integrity and security. In the course of this paper it will become apparent that the arguments made by Russia are indefensible, and are in stark contrast to previous Russian doctrinal approaches in terms of self-determination and territorial integrity. This paper will attempt to provide reason- able evidence to support its claim that Russia had no right to interfere within Ukraine’s territorial integrity nor to facilitate actions against it.
Keywords
References
- Academic Articles and BooksGoogle Scholar ↗
- J Mankoff, ‘Russia’s Latest Land Grab’ (2014) 5 Foreign Affairs 512.Google Scholar ↗
- Case ListGoogle Scholar ↗
- Austin v United Kingdom [2012] ECHR 459.Google Scholar ↗
- Ireland v United Kingdom [1978] ECHR 1.Google Scholar ↗
- Islamic Community of Bosnia v Bosnia and Herzegovina [1995] ECHR 67.Google Scholar ↗
- Makaratzis v Greece [2004] EHRR 56.Google Scholar ↗
- McCann v United Kingdom [1995] ECHR 97.Google Scholar ↗
- Moisejevs v Latvia [2006] ECHR 22.Google Scholar ↗
- Putintseva v Russia [2012] ECHR 212.Google Scholar ↗
- Savchenko v Russia [2015] ECHR 296.Google Scholar ↗
- Shishkin v Russia [2011] ECHR 4.Google Scholar ↗
- Steel v United Kingdom (1998) 28 EHRR 603.Google Scholar ↗
- Tyrer v United Kingdom [1978] ECHR 72.Google Scholar ↗
- Ukraine v Russia (II) [2015] ECHR 13.Google Scholar ↗
- Ukraine v Russia (III) [2015] ECHR 14.Google Scholar ↗
- Ukraine v Russia (IV) [2015] ECHR 15.Google Scholar ↗
- Human Rights ReportsGoogle Scholar ↗
- https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/11/17/crimea-human-rights-decline (21st February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-and-central-asia/ukraine/report-ukraine/ (21st February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/10thOHCHRreportUkraine.pdf. (30th April 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.coe.int/en/web/moscow/-/council-of-europe-human-rights-mission-returns-from-crimea?inheritRedirect=true (21st February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- https://www.chathamhouse.org/event/political-landscape-russia-one-year-after-crimea (21st February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- WebsitesGoogle Scholar ↗
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31796226 (28th February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- https://newcoldwar.org/ (21st February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/CP_Russia_ENG.pdf. (29th April 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/default_en.asp (28th February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.euractiv.com/section/europe-s-east/news/russia-overrules-the-european-court-of-human-rights/ (28th February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx (28th February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- Human Rights InstrumentsGoogle Scholar ↗
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.Google Scholar ↗
- European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms:Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html#C.Art2 (28th February 2016),Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html#C.Art3 (28th February 2016),Google Scholar ↗
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx (28th February 2016),Google Scholar ↗
- https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&lang=en (28th February 2016),Google Scholar ↗
- Rules of the European Court of Human Rights:Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=applicants (28th February 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- Rules of the President of the European Court of Human Rights: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/PD_satisfaction_claims_ENG.pdf (30th April 2016).Google Scholar ↗
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html (29th February 2016),Google Scholar ↗
- https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?chapter=4&src=treaty&mtdsg_no=iv-4&lang=en (29th April 2016)Google Scholar ↗
- United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx (28th February 2016), http://indicators.ohchr.org/ (28th February 2016),Google Scholar ↗
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969:Google Scholar ↗
- http://www.oas.org/legal/english/docs/Vienna%20Convention%20Treaties.htm (30th April 2016).Google Scholar ↗