ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Engineering and Computer Science
Open Access

Implementing Explainable AI in Healthcare: Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning Models in Clinical Decision-Making

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v9i05.ec03· Pages: 597-603· Vol. 9, No. 05, (2021)· Published: May 25, 2021
PDF
Views: 1,526 PDF downloads: 478

Abstract

The integration of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in healthcare is revolutionizing clinical decision-making by providing clarity around complex machine learning (ML) models. As AI becomes increasingly critical in medical fields—ranging from diagnostics to treatment personalization—the interpretability of these models is crucial for fostering trust, transparency, and accountability among healthcare providers and patients. Traditional "black-box" models, such as deep neural networks, often achieve high accuracy but lack transparency, creating challenges in highly regulated, high-stakes settings like healthcare. Explainable AI addresses this issue by employing methods that make model decisions understandable and justifiable, ensuring that clinicians can interpret, trust, and apply AI recommendations safely and effectively.

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of explainable AI techniques specifically tailored for healthcare applications, focusing on two primary approaches: intrinsic interpretability and post-hoc interpretability. Intrinsic techniques, which design models to be naturally interpretable (e.g., decision trees, logistic regression), enable clinicians to directly trace and understand the rationale behind model predictions. Post-hoc techniques, on the other hand, provide interpretability for complex models after they have been trained. Examples include SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations), and saliency maps in medical imaging, each of which provides insights into how and why specific predictions are made.

This study also examines the unique challenges of implementing explainable AI in healthcare, such as balancing accuracy with interpretability, addressing the diversity of stakeholder needs, and ensuring data privacy. Through real-world case studies—such as early sepsis detection in intensive care units and the use of saliency maps in radiology—the paper demonstrates how explainable AI improves clinical workflows, enhances patient outcomes, and fosters regulatory compliance by enabling transparency in automated decision-making. Ultimately, this work underscores the transformative potential of explainable AI to make machine learning models not only powerful but also trustworthy, actionable, and ethical in the context of healthcare.

Keywords

Explainable AIInterpretable Machine LearningClinical Decision-MakingHealthcare AITransparencyModel InterpretabilitySHAPLIMEIntrinsic Interpretability

References

  1. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138-52160. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., & Teredesai, A. (2018). Interpretable machine learning in healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (pp. 559-560). doi:10.1145/3233547.3233667DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Biran, O., & Cotton, C. (2017). Explanation and justification in machine learning: A survey. In IJCAI-17 Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI).Google Scholar ↗
  4. Ching, T., Himmelstein, D. S., Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., Kalinin, A. A., Do, B. T., Way, G. P., et al. (2018). Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(141), 20170387. doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0387DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  5. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Ghassemi, M., Naumann, T., Schulam, P., Beam, A. L., Chen, I. Y., & Ranganath, R. (2020). A review of challenges and opportunities in machine learning for health. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 191-200.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Gilpin, L. H., Bau, D., Yuan, B. Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M., & Kagal, L. (2018). Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA) (pp. 80-89). doi:10.1109/DSAA.2018.00018DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2019). Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(4), e1312. doi:10.1002/widm.1312DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  9. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., et al. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), e000101. doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000101DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 195. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874Google Scholar ↗
  12. Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2018). Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 19(6), 1236-1246. doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1-38. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Obermeyer, Z., & Emanuel, E. J. (2016). Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 375(13), 1216-1219. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1606181DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Rajpurkar, P., Hannun, A. Y., Haghpanahi, M., Bourn, C., & Ng, A. Y. (2017). Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection with convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01836.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1135-1144). doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high-stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Shortliffe, E. H., & Sepúlveda, M. J. (2018). Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA, 320(21), 2199-2200. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17163DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  19. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Wang, F., & Preininger, A. (2019). AI in health: State of the art, challenges, and future directions. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 28(1), 16-26. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677899DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Gopalakrishnan Arjunan
AI/ML Engineer at Accenture, Bangalore
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication