ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Poultry Science
Open Access

Inherent Mothering Ability of Indigenous Hen under Extensive Free-Range Management, A-Close Observational Study

, , , , ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v10i4.ps1· Pages: 71-76· Vol. 10, No. 04, (2022)· Published: April 12, 2022
PDF
Views: 444 PDF downloads: 257

Abstract

Inherent mothering ability of the indigenous hen under extensive management is geared towards ensuring continuation of its lineage. Most of these attributes (feeding and predators response) are instinctive and transmitted to chicks during their first week of life to enhance their survival.

The study was carried out over a ten-years period base on direct keen observation of the indigenous hen from the point of attainment of puberty and associating with cocks up to the time it’s raising her own brood under extensive management and recordings of inherent and instinctive traits exhibited. Maternal behaviours like egg incubation; candling and sorting; egg turning; temperature regulation and hatching are in synchrony with the hatching machine. Chick brooding and rearing periods presents the most challenging time as she has to balance between two key responsibilities (feeding and chick protection), these it was observed she do diligently to ensure the propagation of its lineage though faced with huge challenges from predators and adverse weather conditions that reduce chick population reaching maturity.

This research findings recommends feed supplementation especially during incubation, brooding and chick rearing period and confinement and protection of young chicks from predators and adverse weather conditions until they reach weaning age.

Keywords

maternal behaviourscavengingpredatormortality

References

  1. Cate C.T., Bateson P. Sexual selection: The evolution of conspicuous characteristics in birds by means of imprinting. Evolution. 1988; 42:1355–1358. doi: 10.2307/2409020. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Collias N.E., Collias E.C., Hunsaker D., Minning L. Locality fixation, mobility and social organization within an unconfined population of red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav. 1966; 14:550–559. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(66)80059-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Falt B. Development of responsiveness to the individual maternal clucking by domestic chicks (gallus-gallus-domesticus) Behav. Process. 1981;6:303–317. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(81)90048-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. McBride G., Parer I.P., Foenander F. The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 1969; 2:125–181. doi: 10.1016/S0066-1856(69)80003-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  5. Nakamori T., Maekawa F., Sato K., Tanaka K., Ohki-Hamazaki H. Neural basis of imprinting behavior in chicks. Dev. Growth Differ. 2013; 55:198–206. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12028. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google ScholarDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Slagsvold T., Hansen B.T., Johannessen L.E., Lifjeld J.T. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2002;269:1449–1455. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2045. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  7. Stokes A.W. Parental and courtship feeding in red jungle fowl. Auk. 1971; 88:21–29. doi: 10.2307/4083958. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Tschanz B.T. The emergence of the personal relationship between young bird and parents. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. Suppl. 1978;4:51–100. [Google Scholar]Google Scholar ↗
  9. Tuculescu R.A., Griswold J.G. (2010) Perinatal Acoustic communication in birds. Why do birds vocalize in theeggGoogle Scholar ↗
  10. Tuculescu R.A., Griswold J.G. Prehatching interactions in domestic chickens. Anim. Behav. 1983;31:1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80168-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Workman L., Andrew R.J. Simultaneous changes in behavior and in lateralization during the development of male and female domestic chicks. Anim. Behav. 1989; 38:596–605. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80004-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Jesse Patrick Joseph Nyandebo
Animal Science Department, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Njala University.
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Victor Patrick Bagla
Animal Science Department, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Njala University.
👤 View Profile →
Saidu Kanu
2Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Makeni 3Public Health and Psychosocial Pillar of NACOVAC-SL
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
Abigail Muana
Public Health and Psychosocial Pillar of NACOVAC-SL
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
Abdul Rahman Sesay
Animal Science Department, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Njala University.
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
Magdalene Philips Umoh
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Makeni
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication