Abstract
Humour with its different forms is a universal phenomenon. The joke is among these forms. Although they are not famous for their sense of humour, Hadrami people have their own special cultural heritage of jokes. This study attempts to investigate the semantic and pragmatic features of the punchline of a selected number of Hadrami jokes depending on two parameters of the General Theory of Verbal Humour (GTVH) which are Script Opposition (SO) and Language (LA). The linguistic constructs of LA are adopted from Leech's (1981) associative meanings and Grice's (1975) conversational implicature theory. The sample has been collected from the Internet and Hadrami people. After excluding the irrelevant ones, 37 jokes has been studied within the theoretical framework of this study following the discourse analysis approach of linguistic qualitative researches. The findings show that the most frequent SO in Hadrami jokes are: expected/ unexpected, and stingy/ not stingy. Also, the semantic features exceed the pragmatic ones. Within the semantic features, the connotations exceed – in their turn- the social and the collocative meanings. The focus of the pragmatic features is violating the maxims mainly under the SO parameter stingy/ not stingy. These findings prove that the punchlines of Hadrami jokes are the focal point of the joke and they represent loaded language with a great diversity of semantic and pragmatic indications.
Keywords
References
- Al-Amd, H 2006, Malamehalnuktahalsha'biah fi Al-Urdonthaqafahsha'biahmutahrrekahwafa'elah, derasat, Al-'ulom al-insaniahwaaligtima'iah, Vol. 33Google Scholar ↗
- AbdAlhameed, Sh, Abdullah, m S and Ashmawi, S (2004), Alfukaha wa aaliat alnaqd aligtima' I, markaz albuhuth wa al derasat aligtima'iah, Faculty of Arts-Cairo university.Google Scholar ↗
- Al-shatery, MA (1993), Adwar Alt'reekh al Hadrami, 3rdedn. Dar Almuhajer, TareemGoogle Scholar ↗
- Attardo, S (2000), Humorous Texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Youngstown State UniversityGoogle Scholar ↗
- Baxter, J (2010), 'Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk' in Research in linguistics, ed L. Litosseliti, Continuum International Publishing Group, London.Google Scholar ↗
- Binay, S (2013), "Where are they going?": Jokes as Indicators of Social and Political Change, Orient-Institut Studies 2. Viewed in 28 Jan. 2014. <http://www.perspectivia.net/…/pdfducument>.Google Scholar ↗
- Cutting, J (2002), Pragmatic and Discourse, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar ↗
- El-Khatib, AS (n.d.), 'Verbal play in Egyptian political jokes: pragmalinguistic and sociolinguistic perspective', WATA. Viewed in 28 Jan. 2014, from http://www.wata.cc/.../ 12.htmlGoogle Scholar ↗
- Hemplemann, CF, Taylor JM, and Raskin V (n.d.), Tightening up joke structure: not by length alone. Purdue University. Viewed in 12 Dec. 2013, from http://mindmodelling.org/…/paper0089pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
- Kazarian, SS (2011), Humor in the collectivist Arab Middle East: The case of Lebanon.Humor 24–3, 329–348. Viewed in 11 Feb. 2014, from http://www.aub.edu.ib/fas/psychology/peopleGoogle Scholar ↗
- Krikmann, A (2006). Contemporary linguistic theories of humour.Viewed in 28 Jan. 2014, from http://folklore.ee/.../kriku.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
- Leech, G (1981), Semantics, 2nd edn., Penguin Books, England.Google Scholar ↗
- Lew, R (1996), Ambiguity-generating devices in linguistic verbal jokes. School of English. Adam Mickiewicz university. Viewed in 20 Jan. 2014, from http://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/jspui/bitstGoogle Scholar ↗
- Marín-Arrese, JI (2003), Humour as Ideological Struggle: The View from Cognitive Linguistics. Universidad Complutense de Rioja. 8th International cognitive linguistic conference. 20-25 MayViewed in 10 Jan. 2014, from http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.ac.be/iclcPaGoogle Scholar ↗
- Ritchie, G (2004), The linguistic analysis of jokes, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar ↗
- Schwarz , J (2010), Linguistic Aspects of Verbal Humor, in Stand-up Comedy, PhD Thesis, Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar ↗