ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

Influence of Risk Management on Project Implementation, a Case Study of Indoor Residual Spraying Project in Rwanda

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v10i11.em05· Pages: 4166-4195· Vol. 10, No. 11, (2022)· Published: November 18, 2022
PDF
Views: 491 PDF downloads: 221

Abstract

The study entitled “Influence of Risk Management on Project Implementation, a case of Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project in Rwanda”. The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of project risk management on project implementation in Rwanda with reference to Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project.  The study was guided by  four specific objectives: to examine the influence of project risk identification on implementation of Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project, to assess the influence of Project Risk Analysis on the implementation of Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project, to find out the influence of project risk response planning on the implementation of Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project and to ascertain the influence of Project risk monitoring and control on the implementation of  Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project. The research designs that were used in this study are descriptive research design and analytical research design. The study used 83 employees of Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Project as sample size. The study used stratified sampling techniques to select   whole population to participate in this study. The study used questionnaires, interview guide and documentary review as method of data collection and finally the study used descriptive statistics and inferential statistics such as correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis as method of data analysis. For the first objective, the findings revealed that there existed a significant moderate positive correlation (R = 0.552**, p-value=0.002<0.01) between project risk identification and implementation of (IRS) Project and also results revealed that project risk identification have significance positive effect on implementation of (IRS) Project as indicated by β1= 0.199, p=0.000<0.05, t= 3.257. The implication is that an increase of one unit in project risk identification would lead to an increase in implementation of (IRS) Project by 0.199 units. For the second objective, the findings revealed that there existed a significant weak positive correlation (R = 0.375**,p-value=0.000<0.01) between project risk analysis and implementation of (IRS) Project and also the results revealed that project risk analysis have significance positive effect on implementation of (IRS) Project as indicated by β2=1.226, p=0.000<0.05, t=8.797. For the third objective, the findings revealed that there existed significant high positive correlation (R = 0. 797**,p-value=0.003<0.01) between project risk response and implementation of (IRS) Project and also the results revealed that project risk response planning have significance positive effect on implementation of (IRS) Project as indicated by β3= 0.396, p=0.000<0.05, t= 3.781. For the fourth objective, the findings revealed that the study established the existed of a strong positive correlation (R = 0.681**,p-value=0.001<0.01) between project risk monitoring & control and implementation of (IRS) Project and also the regression results revealed that project risk monitoring and control have significance positive effect on implementation of (IRS) Project as indicated by β4= 0.341, p=0.040<0.05, t= 2.085. As such, the project management team should explore ways for enhancing the effectiveness of the tools in risk analysis by providing more orientation of stakeholders on this.

References

  1. Addison, W. &Vallabh, P. (2012) Influence of project risk Identification implementation of software projects in IT enterprises in China. Journal of Project Risk Management, 8(1), 17-24.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Aduma, L. K. & Kimutai, G. (2018). Project risk management strategies and project implementation at the National Hospital Insurance Fund in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 3(2), 80-110Google Scholar ↗
  3. Ahsan, K., & Gunawan, I. (2015). Analysis of cost and schedule implementation of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management. 28(1), 68-78Google Scholar ↗
  4. Akintoye,A.S. & Macleod, M.j. (2017), Risk analysis and management in Construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 1- 38.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Amos, J. & Dents, P. (2015). Risk analysis and management for major construction projects. Proceedings: RICS COBRA 1997 Conference. Portsmouth, September 1–35Google Scholar ↗
  6. Bader, A. A. (2015). Risk management in fast-track projects: a study of UAE construction projects, A Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of WolverhamptonGoogle Scholar ↗
  7. Bakker, K., Boonstra A., & Wortmann, H. (2009). Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta -analysis of empirical evidence. International Journal of Project Management, 5(2), 54-62.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Bamberger, M. and Cheema, S. (2011) “Case Studies of Project Sustainability: Implications for Policy and Operations from Asian Experience”. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Berg, H. P. (2015). Risk Management: Procedures, Methods, and Experiences, Journal of Risk Research, 3(4), 157–176.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Bharwani, S. & Mathews, D. (2012). Risk identification and analysis in the hospitality industry: Practitioners' perspectives from India. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 4(5), 410 – 427.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Burns, N., & Grove, K. (2003). Understanding nursing research (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W.B./Saunders CompanyGoogle Scholar ↗
  12. Byoun, S., Kim, J. & Yoo, S. S. (2013). Risk management with leverage: evidence from project finance; Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 48 (2), 549- 577.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Cagno, E., Caron, F., & Mancini, M.. (2017). A multi-dimensional analysis of major risks in complex projects. Risk Management: 1–18.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Carbone, T.A. & Tippett, D.D. (2014). Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal, 16 (4), 28-35Google Scholar ↗
  15. Challal, A., & Tkiouat, M. (2012). Identification of the Causes of Deadline Slippage in Construction Projects: State of the Art and Application. Journal of Service Science and Management, 5(2),56-82Google Scholar ↗
  16. Chen, W.T. & Chen, T.T., (2007). Critical success factors for construction partnering in Taiwan. International Journal o f Project Management, 25 (5), 475—484.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Chua, D.K.H., Kog, Y.C., and Loh, P.K. (2009). Project management practices for different project objectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125 (3), 142-150.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar ↗
  19. De Furia, L.G. (2008). Project Management Recipes for Success. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Donaldson, L., (2001). The Contingency. Theory of Organizations Thousand. Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Dorfman, M.S. (2017). Introduction to Risk Management and Insurance, (9ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Douglas, H. (2015). The failure of risk management: Why It's Broken and How to fix it. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Edwards, P J, and Bowen, P A (2015). Risk Management in Project Organisations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Elkington, P and Smallman, C (2002). Managing project risks: a case study from the utilities sector. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 49-57.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Figueiredo, F. & Kitson, B. (2009). Defining risk and contingency for pipeline Projects, AACE International Transactions, 8 (1), 1-10.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Ghahramanzadeh, M. (2013). Managing Risk of Construction Projects, A Case Study of Iran. (A Doctor of Philosophy thesis), University of East London.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Gkritza, K., & Labi, S. (2008). Estimating Cost Discrepancies in Highway Contracts: Multistep Econometric Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(12), 935-962.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Goble, R., & Bier, V. M (2013). Risk assessment can be a game-changing information technology but too often it isn’t Risk Analysis: An International Journal; 33 (11), 1942- 1951.Javed, A. A.; LamGoogle Scholar ↗
  29. Hernon, P., & Whitman, R. J. (2015). Delivering satisfaction and service quality: A customer-based approach for libraries. Chicago: The American Library Association.Google Scholar ↗
  30. ICE (2015). RAMP - Risk Analysis and Management for Projects: A Strategic Framework for Managing Project Risk and its Financial Implications (2nd ed.). London: Thomas Telford PublishingGoogle Scholar ↗
  31. Jaafari, A. (2011). Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. International Journal o f Project Management, 19(7), 89-101.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Kangari, R. (2015). Risk management perceptions and trends of U.S. construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4), 58-74.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Kendrick, T. (2013). Identifying and Managing Project Risk. American Management Association, New York, NYGoogle Scholar ↗
  34. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (10th ed.). New Jersy: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar ↗
  35. Khakina, W. (2006). Factors influencing NGO’s Project success the managers’ perspective: A survey of NGO’s in Nairobi. Unpublished MBA project, University o f Nairobi.Google Scholar ↗
  36. Kipkoech M. S. & Kenneth, C.(2018). Influence of Project Risk Management on implementation of telecommunication network modernisation projects in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 3 (7),101 – 124Google Scholar ↗
  37. Kombo, K. D., & Tromp, L. D. (2006). Proposal and writing: An introduction. Nairobi: Paulines Publications AfricaGoogle Scholar ↗
  38. Kothari, C. R. (2011). Research methodology: Methods & techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Limited Publishers.Google Scholar ↗
  39. Kululanga, G., & Kuotcha, W. (2015). Measuring project risk management process for construction contractors with statement indicators linked to numerical scores. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17 (4), 336 -351.Google Scholar ↗
  40. Kutsch, E., & Hall, M. (2015). Intervening conditions on the management of project risk: Dealing with uncertainty in information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(8), 591-599.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Kasiita Karera Godfrey
Master of Business Administration in Project Management of the University of Kigali.
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication