ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Agriculture and Horticulture
Open Access

Cultivating Progress-The Crucial Link between Seed Selection and Agricultural Transformation in India

, ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v11i09.ah01· Pages: 389-394· Vol. 11, No. 09, (2023)· Published: September 4, 2023
PDF
Views: 393 PDF downloads: 217

Abstract

This review article, titled "Cultivating Progress: The Crucial Link Between Seed Selection and Agricultural Transformation in India," intricately examines the pivotal role that seed selection plays in shaping India's agricultural landscape. Through an exploration of seed diversity, indigenous knowledge, and the Green Revolution, it elucidates how the right choice of seeds has driven innovation, sustainability, and empowerment in Indian farming. The review underscores the importance of climate-resilient seeds, equitable access, and the synergy of biotechnology and genetic diversity conservation. As the agricultural journey continues, this article highlights that seeds are not mere commodities but catalysts for progress, resilience, and abundance

Keywords

Seed selectionAgricultural transformationIndiaSeed diversityIndigenous knowledgeGreen RevolutionClimate-resilient seedsBiotechnologyGenetic diversitySustainability

References

  1. Mishra, A. K., Salam, P. A., Singh, V. P., & Krishna, R. (2017). Sahbhagi Dhan: A transformative rice production programme in Bihar, India. Rice, 10(1), 46. [DOI: 10.1186/s12284-017-0171-3](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-017-0171-3)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Jarvis, D. I., Brown, A. H. D., Cuong, P. H., Collado-Panduro, L., Latournerie-Moreno, L., Gyawali, S., ... & Tanto, T. (2008). A global perspective of the richness and evenness of traditional crop-variety diversity maintained by farming communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(14), 5326-5331.Google Scholar ↗
  3. [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800607105](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800607105)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Sthapit, B., & Rana, R. B. (2002). On-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in Nepal. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar ↗
  5. [Link](https://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/user_upload/online_library/publications/pdfs/1097.pdf)Google Scholar ↗
  6. Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. South End PressGoogle Scholar ↗
  7. Uphoff, N. (2007). The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) as a methodology for reducing water requirement in irrigated rice production. Paper presented at the International Workshop on SRI, Cuttack, India. [Link](http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/)Google Scholar ↗
  8. Altieri, M. A. (2004). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), 35-42.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Dalrymple, D. G. (2000). Development and spread of high-yielding wheat varieties in developing countries and the role of CIMMYT 1966-1999. In The first 50 years (pp. 47-56). CIMMYT.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Shiva, V. (1991). The violence of the green revolution: Ecological degradation and political conflict in Punjab. Zed Books.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Pingali, P. L., & Rajaram, S. (1999). Technological progress in wheat: From agronomy to genomics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar ↗
  12. [Link](http://www.fao.org/3/x9800e/X9800E07.htm)Google Scholar ↗
  13. National Seeds Corporation (NSC). (n.d.). About Us.Google Scholar ↗
  14. [Link](http://www.indiaseeds.com/aboutus.htm)Google Scholar ↗
  15. Shiva, V. (2000). Tomorrow's Biodiversity. Resurgence & Ecologist Magazine. [Link](https://www.resurgence.org/magazine/article1.html)Google Scholar ↗
  16. Lobell, D. B., & Gourdji, S. M. (2012). The Influence of Climate Change on Global Crop Productivity. Plant Physiology, 160(4), 1686-1697.Google Scholar ↗
  17. [DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.208298](https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208298)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Altieri, M. A. (2002). Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 93(1-3), 1-24. [DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00085-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00085-3)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  19. De Schutter, O. (2011). Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. United Nations General Assembly. [Link](https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Food/Pages/FoodIndex.aspx)Google Scholar ↗
  20. James, C. (2016). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief No. 52. [Link](http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/52/default.asp)Google Scholar ↗
  21. Maxted, N., & Kell, S. (2009). Establishment of a global network for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives: Status and needs. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Link](http://www.fao.org/3/i0580e/i0580e.pdf)Google Scholar ↗
  22. Ashby, J., & Sperling, L. (1995). Institutional options for generating and disseminating technology to improve household food security. Food Policy, 20(3),281-292.[DOI:10.1016/0306-9192(95)00011 4](https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00011-4)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Madhwendra Kumar Pathak
PG Scholar, Department of Genetics and plant breeding SHUATS Prayagraj-211007(U.P)
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
R.P. Srivastava
Associate Professor, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Mandsaur University, Mandsaur (M.P)
👤 View Profile →
Deepak Lohar
PG Scholar, Department of Agronomy, Mandsaur University, Mandsaur (M.P)
👤 View Profile →