ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Education And Language
Open Access

Effect of Stad Model of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Learning Outcome on Nomenclature of Hydrocarbon

, ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i03.el03· Pages: 3264-3274· Vol. 12, No. 03, (2024)· Published: March 10, 2024
PDF
Views: 1,300 PDF downloads: 237

Abstract

Students Team Achievement Division model of cooperative learning was employed to examine its effect on the learning outcome of students in the concept of nomenclature of hydrocarbons. Forty-one (41) students were purposively sampled for the study. The study employed an action research design. Pre and post-intervention tests were conducted before and after the intervention respectively to determine the effect of the intervention on students’ learning outcome. The findings from the study showed that the STAD model of cooperative learning significantly improved learning outcome of the students in nomenclature of hydrocarbons. The study concluded that STAD model of cooperative learning was an effective learning model for improving students’ learning outcome. The STAD model of cooperative learning provided conducive environment for active participation of learners resulting in meaning construction of knowledge. The intervention provided opportunities for developing analytical and critical thinking skills. The study therefore recommended the use of STAD model of cooperative learning for students owing to its effectiveness in improving learning outcome.

Keywords

STADcooperative learningIUPAC nomenclaturelearning outcome

References

  1. Abd Mokmin, A. U. P., Bungsu, J., & Shahrill, M. (2022). Improving the Performance and Knowledge Retention of Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Students in the Theory of Light through STAD Cooperative Learning. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 3(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.17509/xxxx.xxxxDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Adawiyah, R., Zubaidah, S., Listyorini, D., & Astriani, M. (2021). The potential of Remap STAD in improving motivation and academic achievement. AIP Conference Proceedings,Google Scholar ↗
  3. Adebola, O. O., Tsotetsi, C. T., & Omodan, B. I. (2020). Enhancing students' academic performance in university system: The perspective of supplemental instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.13DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Agarwal, R. (2010). Cooperative learning. Gyan Publishing House.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Ajaja, O. P. (2013). Which way do we go in biology teaching? Lecturing, Concept mapping, Cooperative learning or Learning cycle? The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 17(1).Google Scholar ↗
  6. Akpan, J. P., & Beard, L. A. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enhance academic outcomes of students with special needs. Universal journal of educational Research, 4(2), 392-398.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Anam, F., A’yun, D. Q., Asitah, N., Purnomo, A., & Laili, M. (2021). Do STAD Learning Method Can Improve Students' Learning Outcomes on Social Science? Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 4(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijies.v4i1.1490DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Arra, C. T., D'Antonio, M. D., & D'Antonio Jr, M. (2011). Students' Preferences for Cooperative Learning Instructional Approaches: Considerations for College Teachers. Journal of Research in Education, 21(1), 114-126.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Austin, A. C., Ben-Daat, H., Zhu, M., Atkinson, R., Barrows, N., & Gould, I. R. (2015). Measuring student performance in general organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 168-178.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Awada, G., Burston, J., & Ghannage, R. (2020). Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1558254DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Bahari, A., Luthan, E., Azmi, W., & Anshar, A. L. (2021). Cooperative Model Type STAD and Its Effect on Student Learning Outcomes at Sustainability Accounting Courses. The 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020),Google Scholar ↗
  12. Berzener, A. (2021). The Effect of Cooperative Learning on EFL Learners' Success of Reading Comprehension: An Experimental Study Implementing Slavin's STAD Method. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(4), 90-100.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Boutin Jr, P. J. (2021). Teaching Personal Selling Strategies and Tactics with Popular Culture Examples: An Active Learning In-Class Group Activity.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., . . . Smith, T. L. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature News, 523(7560), 282.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Chang, R., & Overby, J. (2022). chemistry (fourteenth ed.). McGraw Hill LLC.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Da Silva Júnior, J. N., Nobre, D. J., Do Nascimento, R. S., Torres, G. S., Jr., Leite, A. J. M., Jr., Monteiro, A. J., . . . Rojo, M. J. (2018). Interactive Computer Game That Engages Students in Reviewing Organic Compound Nomenclature. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 899-902. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00793DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. De la Barra, E., & Carbone, S. (2020). Bridging Inequality: Cooperative Learning Through Literature in Two Vulnerable Schools in Santiago. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 22(2), 49-63.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Ekpenyong, J. A., Owan, V. J., Mbon, U. F., & Undie, S. B. (2023). Family and community inputs as predictors of students’ overall, cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning outcomes in secondary schools.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Fendos, J. (2021). Combining Jigsaws, Rule-Based Learning, and Retrieval Practice Improves IUPAC Nomenclature Competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1503-1517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01235DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Finnegan, M., & Ginty, C. (2019). Moodle and social constructivism: Is Moodle being used as constructed? A case study analysis of Moodle use in teaching and learning in an Irish Higher Educational Institute. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 11(1).Google Scholar ↗
  21. Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39-49.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41(3), 39-54.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Haritsah, S. (2022). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Student Teams Achievement Devision) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. Journal of Indonesian Teachers for Science and Technology, 1(2), 12-23.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Headley, A. D. (2020). Organic chemistry : concepts and applications (1 ed.). Texas A&M University).Google Scholar ↗
  25. Hussien, A. M. (2020). The Impact of Combining Communicative Traits of Writing with Cooperative Learning on Trainee Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge and Attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 813-930. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13152aDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  26. Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does Remap-STAD have the potential to promote students’ creative thinking skills? AIP Conference Proceedings,Google Scholar ↗
  27. Ishtiaq, M. I., Ali, Z., & Salem, M. S. (2017). An experimental study of the effect of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) on vocabulary learning of EFL adult learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Islami, A. I., Budiasih, E., Sukarianingsih, D., & Sulistina, O. (2021). STAD-NHT vs STAD learning models; the difference in students’ achievement on redox reaction. AIP Conference Proceedings,Google Scholar ↗
  29. Jahanbakhsh, A. A., AliAsgariZamani, M., & Garman, Z. (2019). CIRC and STAD in Iranian context: Through the five elements to cooperative learning of lexical collocations. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), 1692469. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1692469DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  30. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational researcher, 38(5), 365-379.Google Scholar ↗
  31. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active Learning—Beyond the Future. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  32. Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Putting it into practice. Sage.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Kalina, C., & Powell, K. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.Google Scholar ↗
  34. Khidr, Z. H., & Sabri, W. M. N. (2022). The Impact of STAD Strategy on the Academic Achievement of Eighth-Grade Students in Sciences Subject and Developing their Scientific Trends. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, 82(82), 208-239. https://doi.org/10.33193/jalhss.82.2022.714DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  35. Kim, D. (2018). A Study on the Influence of Korean Middle School Students' Relationship through Science Class Applying STAD Cooperative Learning. Journal of technology and Science Education, 8(4), 291-309.Google Scholar ↗
  36. Klein, D. R. (2021). Organic chemistry (4 ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar ↗
  37. Knapp, N. F. (2019). The shape activity: Social constructivism in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 46(1), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318816181DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  38. Li, M., & Lam, B. H. (2013). Cooperative learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 1-33.Google Scholar ↗
  39. Lv, Y. (2014). Cooperative Learning: An Effective Approach to College English Learning. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(9).Google Scholar ↗
  40. Mahamod, Z., & Somasundram, B. (2017). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on the achievement and motivation of the student in learning Malay language. Creative Education, 8(15), 2438-2454.Google Scholar ↗
  41. Menekse, M., Zheng, X., & Anwar, S. (2020). Computer science students' perceived needs for support and their academic performance by gender and residency: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2019-0194DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  42. Mukuka, A., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2021). Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Instruction and Students' Mathematical Reasoning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.12508.73-92DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  43. Mulbar, U., & Minggi, I. (2021). The Development of Mathematics Learning Tools Based on Realistic Approach of Cooperative Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,Google Scholar ↗
  44. Mwanda, G., & Midigo, R. (2019). Understanding the Bottlenecks in Methodological Adoption of Constructivism in Secondary Schools in Kenya. Online Submission, 5(1), 141-150.Google Scholar ↗
  45. Nair, S. M., & Sanai, M. (2018). Effects of Utilizing the STAD Method (Cooperative Learning Approach) in Enhancing Students' Descriptive Writing Skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 239-252.Google Scholar ↗
  46. Nasution, M., & Hafizah, N. (2020). Development of students’ understanding of mathematical concept with STAD type cooperative learning through student worksheets. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,Google Scholar ↗
  47. Obumnenye, N., & Ahiakwo, M. J. (2013). Using stereochemistry models in teaching organic compounds nomenclature: Effect on senior secondary students’ performance in rivers state of Nigeria. African Journal of Chemical Education, 3(2), 91-105.Google Scholar ↗
  48. Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2018). Seven disagreements about cooperative learning. Accounting Education, 27(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1477056DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  49. Oppong, E., Quansah, F., & Boachhie, S. (2022). Improving Pre-service Science Teachers’ Performance in Nomenclature of Aliphatic Hydrocarbons using Flipped Classroom Instruction. Science Education International, 33(1), 102-111.Google Scholar ↗
  50. Prananda, G., & Hadiyanto, H. (2019). The effect of cooperative learning models of stad type on class v science learning learning sd. International Journal Of Educational Dynamics, 1(2), 47-53.Google Scholar ↗
  51. Respati, A. A., & Atun, S. (2023). The Effect of Electronic Modules on Self-regulated Learning and Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Chemical Bonding Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2489-2496.Google Scholar ↗
  52. Rojas-Bustos, K., & Panniello, D. (2022). Action Research to Transform Early Language Practice: Exploring Representations of Plurilingualism in a Private Nursery. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.1.131DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  53. Sarkodie. (2013). Using jigsaw model to enhance S.H.S chemistry students’ performance in organic compounds’ classification and nomenclature (8110130010 )[Unpublished master’s thesis]. UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBAGoogle Scholar ↗
  54. Shobirin, M. S., & Hildiana, L. V. (2021). Efforts to Improve The Learning Outcomes of Islamic Education Through The Cooperative Imprisonment Model of Students Teams Achievement Division (STAD). SCHOOLAR: Social and Literature Study in Education, 1(3), 174-179.Google Scholar ↗
  55. Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Lecture, Cooperative Learning and Concept Mapping: Any Differences on Critical and Creative Thinking Development? International Journal of Instruction, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15144aDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  56. Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 358-374.Google Scholar ↗
  57. Song, Y. (2012). Application of cooperative learning in the college task-based English teaching. Journal of Exam Week, 27(2), 83-84.Google Scholar ↗
  58. Suastika, I. N., Suartama, I. K., Sanjaya, D. B., & Arta, K. S. (2021). Application of multicultural-based learning model syntax of social studies learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(4), 1660-1679.Google Scholar ↗
  59. Syafril, S., Rahayu, T., Wati, W., & Yuberti, Y. (2018). THE APPLICATION OF STAD-COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN DEVELOPING INTEGRATED SCIENCE ON STUDENTS WORKSHEET. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v6i2.1933DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  60. Tabatabaei, O., & Heidari Shahreza, M. A. (2022). Using the STAD Model of Instruction to Enhance Learners’ General Achievement and Creativity. Journal of Language and Translation, 12(1), 121-135.Google Scholar ↗
  61. Takdir, N. (2021). The Effect of Mind Mapping Stad Assistant Cooperative Learning Model On Biology Learning Outcomes And Students' Learning Retention. JIRAN: Journal of Southeast Asia Studies, 2(3).Google Scholar ↗
  62. Tran, V. D. (2013). Theoretical Perspectives Underlying the Application of Cooperative Learning in Classrooms. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 101-115.Google Scholar ↗
  63. Webb, N. (2008). Learning in small groups. A TL Good (Ed.). 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook (pp. 203-211). In: Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar ↗
  64. Wichadee, S. (2005). The effects of cooperative learning on English reading skills and attitudes of the first-year students at Bangkok University. BU academic Review, 4(2), 22-31.Google Scholar ↗
  65. Widana, I. W., & Umam, E. K. (2023). Improving Mathematics Learning Outcomes Using The Mind Mapping Method for Students of SMPN 8 Denpasar. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 373-388.Google Scholar ↗
  66. Yaayin, B., Oppong, E. K., & Hanson, R. (2021). Efficacy of Jigsaw Model in Improving Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Selected Functional Group Organics Compounds. Science education international, 32(3), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i3.2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  67. Yildiz, E., & Arici, N. Ü. (2021). The Effect of Different Cooperative Learning Methods on Laboratory Activities of Science Teacher Candidates. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(2), 116-126.Google Scholar ↗
  68. Yusuf, Q., Jusoh, Z., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2019). Cooperative Learning Strategies to Enhance Writing Skills among Second Language Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1399-1412.Google Scholar ↗
  69. Zahara, L., & Maryam, B. S. (2021). Application of Cooperative Learning Type Stad and Hands on Activity to Student Achievement and Learning Activities. 2nd Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS 2020),Google Scholar ↗
  70. Zubaidah, S., & Corebima, A. D. (2021). The Effect Size of Different Learning on Critical and Creative Thinking Skills of Biology Students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14311aDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Emmanuel Nanor
university of Education Winneba
✉ Corresponding Author
ORCID ↗
👤 View Profile →
Alhassan Mahama
University of Education, Winneba
ORCID ↗
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
Ruby Hanson
University of Education, Winneba
ORCID ↗
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication