ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Engineering and Computer Science
Open Access

Best Practices for Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Implementation in Complex Manufacturing Environments

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i04.ec08· Pages: 1180-1199· Vol. 12, No. 04, (2024)· Published: April 30, 2024
PDF
Views: 759 PDF downloads: 4,269

Abstract

Measurement System Analysis (MSA) is a foundational pillar of quality assurance and statistical process control, especially in high-precision and regulated manufacturing sectors such as semiconductor, automotive, and aerospace. As modern manufacturing systems evolve to accommodate tighter tolerances, faster production cycles, and automated data collection, the accuracy and reliability of measurement systems become mission-critical. Poorly characterized measurement systems can lead to defective products, failed audits, costly rework, and even safety-critical failures.

This paper presents a comprehensive examination of best practices for implementing MSA in complex manufacturing environments. It expands the application of MSA beyond traditional dimensional measurements to include a wide range of precision testing and metrology equipment used in contemporary industries. The research explores the statistical foundations of MSA—especially Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (Gage R&R)—and explains how to correctly design studies using either crossed or nested approaches based on the reusability of parts and the destructiveness of testing procedures.

The paper also addresses advanced analytical methods such as orthogonal regression, which accounts for measurement uncertainty in both dependent and independent variables—a necessity in industries like semiconductor manufacturing where both the reference standard and the measured response have variability. Sector-specific case studies highlight how different industries tailor MSA designs: crossed designs in semiconductor wafer inspections, hybrid designs in automotive CMM applications, and nested designs in aerospace destructive testing.

Key pitfalls in MSA implementation are discussed, including operator error, poor tool calibration, wrong design selection, and blind reliance on software output without contextual understanding. These challenges are addressed through a robust framework of best practices, which includes training programs, calibration protocols, use of automated measurement systems, and advanced statistical modeling.

Visual elements such as pie charts, bar graphs, and tables are incorporated to illustrate variance contributions, industry-specific Gage R&R thresholds, and recommendations for best practice implementation. The paper concludes that, in complex manufacturing systems, MSA must evolve from a basic quality tool into a strategic discipline that informs design, compliance, and operational excellence.

Ultimately, this study contributes to both academic and industrial literature by offering a practical, statistically sound, and sector-specific guide to achieving high measurement system fidelity—ensuring that manufacturers not only produce within tolerance but also operate with confidence in their data integrity.

Keywords

Measurement System AnalysisGage R&ROrthogonal RegressionNested DesignCrossed

References

  1. Doshi, J. A., & Desai, D. A. (2019). Measurement system analysis for continuous quality improvement in automobile SMEs: multiple case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(5-6), 626-640.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Beckert, S. F., & Paim, W. S. (2017). Critical analysis of the acceptance criteria used in measurement systems evaluation. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 8, 23.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Agustiady, T., & Cudney, E. A. (2023). Total productive maintenance: strategies and implementation guide. CRC press.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Smith, R. R., McCrary, S. W., & Callahan, R. N. (2007). Gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies and measurement system analysis: a multimethod exploration of the state of practice. Journal of Industrial Technology, 23(1).Google Scholar ↗
  5. Ocampo, L. (2015). Measurement System Analysis of Wire Pull Test in Semiconductor Wire Bonding Process: A Case Study. Journal of Production Engineering, 18(1), 55160.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Susto, G. A., Pampuri, S., Schirru, A., Beghi, A., & De Nicolao, G. (2015). Multi-step virtual metrology for semiconductor manufacturing: A multilevel and regularization methods-based approach. Computers & Operations Research, 53, 328-337.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Purwins, H., Barak, B., Nagi, A., Engel, R., Höckele, U., Kyek, A., ... & Weinzierl, K. (2013). Regression methods for virtual metrology of layer thickness in chemical vapor deposition. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 19(1), 1-8.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Plura, J., Vykydal, D., Tošenovský, F., & Klaput, P. (2022). Graphical tools for increasing the effectiveness of gage repeatability and reproducibility analysis. Processes, 11(1), 1.Google Scholar ↗
  9. He, S. G., Wang, G. A., & Cook, D. F. (2011). Multivariate measurement system analysis in multisite testing: An online technique using principal component analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14602-14608.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Larsen, G. A. (2003). Measurement system analysis in a production environment with multiple test parameters. Quality Engineering, 16(2), 297-306.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Durivage, M. A. (2015). Practical attribute and variable measurement systems analysis (MSA): A guide for Conducting Gage R&R Studies and test method validations. Quality Press.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Wu, B. (2001). Strategy analysis and system design within an overall framework of manufacturing system management. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing, 14(3), 319-341.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Doshi, J. A., & Desai, D. A. (2019). Measurement system analysis for continuous quality improvement in automobile SMEs: multiple case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(5-6), 626-640.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Alagić, I. (2018, June). Application of MSA as a Lean Six Sigma tool in working conditions automotive firm from B&H. In International Symposium on Innovative and Interdisciplinary Applications of Advanced Technologies (pp. 511-524). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
  15. He, S. G., Wang, G. A., & Cook, D. F. (2011). Multivariate measurement system analysis in multisite testing: An online technique using principal component analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14602-14608.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Beckert, S. F., & Paim, W. S. (2017). Critical analysis of the acceptance criteria used in measurement systems evaluation. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 8, 23.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Smith, R. R., McCrary, S. W., & Callahan, R. N. (2007). Gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies and measurement system analysis: a multimethod exploration of the state of practice. Journal of Industrial Technology, 23(1).Google Scholar ↗
  18. Wu, B. (2001). A unified framework of manufacturing systems design. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(9), 446-469.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Hwang, Y. D. (2006). The practices of integrating manufacturing execution system and six sigma methodology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30, 761-768.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Antony, J., & Taner, T. (2003). A conceptual framework for the effective implementation of statistical process control. Business Process Management Journal, 9(4), 473-489.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Soares, W. D. O. S., Peruchi, R. S., Silva, R. A. V., & Rotella Junior, P. (2022). Gage R&R studies in measurement system analysis: A systematic literature review. Quality Engineering, 34(3), 382-403.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Balci, O. (2001). A methodology for certification of modeling and simulation applications. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 11(4), 352-377.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Butt, J. (2020). A strategic roadmap for the manufacturing industry to implement industry 4.0. Designs, 4(2), 11.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Powell, D., Lundeby, S., Chabada, L., & Dreyer, H. (2017). Lean Six Sigma and environmental sustainability: the case of a Norwegian dairy producer. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1), 53-64.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Peruchi, R. S., Paiva, A. D., Balestrassi, P. P., Ferreira, J. R., & Sawhney, R. (2014). Weighted approach for multivariate analysis of variance in measurement system analysis. Precision Engineering, 38(3), 651-658.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Raisinghani, M. S., Ette, H., Pierce, R., Cannon, G., & Daripaly, P. (2005). Six Sigma: concepts, tools, and applications. Industrial management & Data systems, 105(4), 491-505.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Hwang, Y. D. (2006). The practices of integrating manufacturing execution systems and Six Sigma methodology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31, 145-154.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Vogt, F. G., & Kord, A. S. (2011). Development of quality-by-design analytical methods. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 100(3), 797-812.Google Scholar ↗
  29. ReVelle, J. B. (2001). Manufacturing handbook of best practices: An innovation, productivity, and quality focus. CRC Press.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Schmitt, R. H., Peterek, M., Morse, E., Knapp, W., Galetto, M., Härtig, F., ... & Estler, W. T. (2016). Advances in large-scale metrology–review and future trends. CIRP Annals, 65(2), 643-665.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Gaurav Rajendra Parashare
Master of Science in Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bachelor Production Engineering
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →