Abstract
Emphasising the integration of web and software platforms inside smart ecosystems, this review investigates the difficulties and solutions related with multi-domain interoperability in IoT gateways. Effective smart ecosystem management depends on smooth communication and data exchange between heterogeneous systems like IoT devices spread throughout many different fields. The study notes main obstacles that impede seamless integration: protocol incompatibility, security concerns, and scale problems. We discuss in great depth middleware channels, blockchain for more security, MQTT, CoAP, & common standards (e.g.). Furthermore noted is how fog computing and the edge might help to tackle bandwidth and latency issues. By means of present strategies and future approaches, this analysis emphasises the need of ongoing growth of standards and technology guaranteeing scalable, safe, and productive interoperability across numerous IoT sectors. The supplied information provides a foundation for increasing IoT system utilisation in ever more complex environments.
Keywords
References
- F. Guo, G. Shen, Z. Huang, M. Cai, and L. Wei, “DABAC : Smart Contract-Based Spatio-Temporal Domain Access Control for the Internet of Things,” vol. 11, no. April, 2023.Google Scholar ↗
- N. Slamnik-krijeˇ, G. M. Yilma, M. Liebsch, F. Z. Yousaf, and J. M. Marquez-barja, “Collaborative orchestration of multi-domain edges from a Connected , Cooperative and Automated Mobility ( CCAM ) perspective,” vol. 4, 2023.Google Scholar ↗
- A. Mater and S. Universit, “A Web-based approach for ecosystems of heterogeneous Digital Twins,” 2023.Google Scholar ↗
- G. Tripathi, J. Hamdard, S. Zafar, and J. Hamdard, Principles of Internet of Things ( IoT ) Ecosystem : Insight Paradigm, no. June. 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33596-0.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- M. Hassan, M. A. Gregory, and S. Member, “Multi-Domain Federation Utilizing Software Defined Networking — A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. January, pp. 19202–19227, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3242687.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- K. Y. Hong, “Graph ‑ enabled digital twins for intelligent product lifecycle management : a multi ‑ dimensional approach to design , manufacturing , and supply chain transformation GRAPH-ENABLED DIGITAL TWINS FOR INTELLIGENT PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT : A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL,” 2023.Google Scholar ↗
- M. S. Far et al., “JTrack-EMA + : A Cross-platform Ecological Momentary Assessment Application Table of Contents,” 2023.Google Scholar ↗
- A. Al-najjar and N. S. V Rao, “Virtual Infrastructure Twin for Computing- Instrument Ecosystems : Software and Measurements,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. March, pp. 20254–20266, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3246954.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- W. Zhang and L. Na, “Revolutionizing Mobile App Development : The Swift Advantage in Cross-Platform Programming,” vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 2347–2360, 2022.Google Scholar ↗
- P. Agbaje, A. Anjum, A. Mitra, E. Oseghale, G. Bloom, and S. Member, “Survey of Interoperability Challenges in the Internet of Vehicles,” 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3194413.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- L. Yang, S. Ni, Y. Wang, A. Yu, J. Lee, and P. Hui, “Interoperability of the Metaverse : A Digital Ecosystem Perspective Review,” vol. 1, pp. 1–25, 2023.Google Scholar ↗
- R. Xu, D. Nagothu, Y. Chen, A. Aved, E. Ardiles-cruz, and E. Blasch, “INTERNET OF THINGS A Secure Interconnected Autonomous System Architecture for Multi-Domain IoT Ecosystems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. October, pp. 52–57, 2024, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2300354.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- B. Crispo et al., “CROSSCON : Cross-platform Open Security Stack for Connected Devices,” no. 101070537, pp. 1–8, 2024.Google Scholar ↗
- W. Villegas-ch and R. Gutierrez, “Adaptive Security Framework for the Internet of Things : Improving Threat Detection and Energy Optimization in Distributed Environments,” vol. 12, no. November, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3486983.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- R. Hervás, V. Francisco, E. Concepción, A. F. G. Sevilla, and G. Méndez, “Creating an API Ecosystem for Assistive Technologies Oriented to Cognitive Disabilities,” vol. 12, no. November, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3487308.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- S. Ejaz and M. Al-naday, “FORK : A Kubernetes-compatible Federated Orchestrator of Fog-native applications over multi-domain edge-to-cloud ecosystems,” no. February, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ICIN60470.2024.10494435.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- C. Zhou, “Challenges and solutions in cross-platform mobile development : a qualitative study of Flutter and React Native,” 2024.Google Scholar ↗
- A. Sattar, P. Soni, M. K. Ranjan, and A. Kumar, “Accelerating Cross-platform Development with Flutter Framework,” no. August, pp. 0–11, 2023, doi: 10.37591/joosd.v10i2.580.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- R. Zhao, X. Tao, D. Conzon, and E. Ferrera, “A Cross-Platform Communication Mechanism for ROS-Based Cyber-Physical System,” no. December, 2022.Google Scholar ↗
- R. Ruby, C. Xu, and Z. Zhang, “Explainable AI Over the Internet of Things ( IoT ): Overview , State-of-the-Art and Future Directions,” vol. 3, no. September, 2022.Google Scholar ↗
- M. Ahmed, “Importance of semantic interoperability in smart agriculture systems,” no. August, 2022, doi: 10.1002/ett.4448.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- A. Kumar, S. Sharma, A. Singh, A. Alwadain, and B. Choi, “Revolutionary Strategies Analysis and Proposed System for Future Infrastructure in Internet of Things,” pp. 1–36, 2022.Google Scholar ↗
- B. Zhou, “Building a Smart Education Ecosystem from a Metaverse Perspective,” vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/1938329.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- J. María, J. Valero, P. Miguel, and S. Sánchez, Design of a Security and Trust Framework for 5G Multi ‑ domain Scenarios, vol. 30, no. 1. Springer US, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10922-021-09623-7.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- J. Stanojević, U. Šošević, M. Minović, and M. Milovanović, “An Overview of Modern Cross-platform Mobile Development Frameworks,” pp. 489–497, 2022.Google Scholar ↗
- O. J. Ajayi, J. Rafferty, J. Santos, M. Garcia-constantino, and Z. Cui, “BECA : A Blockchain-Based Edge Computing Architecture for Internet of Things Systems,” pp. 1–23, 2021.Google Scholar ↗
- I. Conference and O. N. Engineering, “SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS LIFECYCLE ENGINEERING APPROACH INTEGRATING SMART PRODUCT AND SERVICE,” no. August, pp. 16–20, 2021, doi: 10.1017/pds.2021.552.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- A. Belsa, “Reviewing SDN adoption strategies for Next Generation Internet of Things networks Reviewing SDN adoption strategies for Next Generation Internet of Things networks,” no. February, 2021.Google Scholar ↗
- E. A. Affum, K. A. Agyekum, C. A. Gyampomah, K. Ntiamoah-sarpong, and J. D. Gadze, “Smart Home Energy Management System based on the Internet of Things ( IoT ),” vol. 12, no. 2, 2021.Google Scholar ↗
- R. Bahsoon, Y. Zhang, and R. Kazman, Architecting Internet of Things Systems with Blockchain : A Catalog of Tactics, vol. 30, no. 3. 2021.Google Scholar ↗
- D. Hummel, “Multi-domain maturity model for AI and analytic capability in power generation sector,” 2021.Google Scholar ↗
- H. Xu, “Key technologies of Secure Multi-Party Computing for Perceived Data Transmission in Internet of Things,” vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 30–42, 2021, doi: 10.25236/IJFET.2021.030504.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- G. E. Modoni, E. G. Caldarola, N. Mincuzzi, and M. Sacco, “Integrating IoT platforms using the INTER-IoT approach : A case study of the CasAware project,” vol. 12, pp. 457–474, 2020, doi: 10.3233/AIS-200578.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- D. Version, N. Diaz, and D. Francesco, “Semantic Interoperability in the IoT : Extending the Web of Things Architecture Semantic Interoperability in the IoT,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3375838.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- H. Su, J. Wu, and L. Liu, “Loop Users in : The Key to Cross-Platform Data Interoperability,” no. c, pp. 23–27, 2020.Google Scholar ↗
- I. Alam, K. Sharif, F. A. N. Li, Z. Latif, M. M. Karim, and S. Biswas, “A Survey of Network Virtualization Techniques for Internet of Things Using A Survey of Network Virtualization Techniques for Internet of Things Using SDN and NFV,” no. April, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3379444.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- A. Biørn-hansen, C. R. T. Grønli, T. A. Majchrzak, and G. Ghinea, “An empirical investigation of performance overhead in cross-platform mobile development frameworks,” pp. 2997–3040, 2020.Google Scholar ↗