The Position and Development of Photocopy Evidence in the Evidence Process Based on the Jurisprudence of the Indonesian Supreme Court

Riris Risnayanti Rahmat; Lucky Nurlita Sari; Eko Susanto Tejo; Kania Juliawati; Verawati Gunawan; Mega Rahayu; Andrian Yogapranatha; Prof. Dr. Efa Laela Fakhriah; Edy Santoso

doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v13i01.lla01

Abstract

The process of proof is the most specific and most decisive stage in a civil case. Proof is an effort by the parties to the case to convince the judge of the truth of the events submitted by the parties by using evidence stipulated by law. In practice, it is often found that the use of photocopy evidence is not available in the original document or cannot be matched with the original document, such as in case number 329/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby. The author examines the role of judges in examining cases that use photocopy evidence and do not have the original, as well as the position of jurisprudence as a reference in the evidence process in court. This study uses a normative-empirical legal approach, analytical descriptive research specifications, and qualitative normative data analysis. The results of the study and discussion concluded that judges play an important role in examining, assessing the strength, and validity of the evidence submitted by the parties to the case by referring to applicable legal sources. The position of jurisprudence is as one of the sources of law, although jurisprudence is not binding on judges, the existence of jurisprudence is a guideline for judges who aim to maintain consistency and prevent disparities in decisions in similar cases.

Keywords

EvidenceProofJurisprudence

References

Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja et.al. Reviewing the Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Concerning the Requirements for President and Vice President Candidates in the Perspective of Progressive Law. (2024). International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12(07), 521. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i07.lla01DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Ali, Achmad. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Jakarta: Kencana, p. 15.Google Scholar ↗
Aprilia Aprilia, Claresta Devina Valencia & Dave David Tedjokusumo. Analisis Yuridis Penyalahgunaan Surat Kuasa Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pembuktian. IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Analisis Yuridis Volume 5 Nomor 2, Juni – September 2024: Page 584Google Scholar ↗
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. (2016). Perbandingan HIR dan RBg Sebagai Hukum Acara Perdata Positif di Indonesia. Bandung: Keni Media, p. 11.Google Scholar ↗
Ninung Rusalia Hikmah, Marjo, Lapon Tukan Leonard. Pembuktian Dengan Alat Bukti Akta Dibawah Tangan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal Volume 9, Nomor 2, Tahun 2020, p. 467.Google Scholar ↗
https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/glosarium-hukum/2192-actori-in-combit-probatio, accesed November 20, 2024Google Scholar ↗
Decision of the Surabaya District Court Number 329/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby, p. 120.Google Scholar ↗
Cassation Decision Number 1800 K/Pdt/2023, p. 18.Google Scholar ↗
Soeroso, R. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata Lengkap dan Praktis HIR, Rbg., dan Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, p. 118.Google Scholar ↗
Puspita Sari, Devina. Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Surat yang Tidak Dapat Dicocokkan dengan Aslinya dalam Perkara Perdata. Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): 340, DOI: 10.22437/ujh.2.2.323-352DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Tejo, E. S., Kurniati, Y., & RAS, H. (2024). Criminological Review of the Crime of Prostitution in a Group of Sexual Fantasy Performer on Social Media. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 5(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v5i2.1511DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. (2019). Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, p. 45.Google Scholar ↗
Subekti. (2003). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, p. 17.Google Scholar ↗
Manan, Abdul. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana, p. 228.Google Scholar ↗
Harahap M. Yahya. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cet. Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, p. 498.Google Scholar ↗
Effendie Lotulung, Paulus. (1998). Peranan Yurisprudensi Sebagai Sumber Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, p. 12-13.Google Scholar ↗
A.Muhtarom. Menjadi Hakim Ideal Dalam Pengambilan Putusan. 03 March 2023 https://www.pa-kebumen.go.id/berita-pusat/419-menjadi-hakim-ideal-dalam-pengambilan-putusan, accesed November 18, 2024Google Scholar ↗
Helmy Abi Nugraha. Pembuktian dalam Hukum Perdata. 26 September 2023. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-batam/baca-artikel/16467/Pembuktian-dalam-Hukum-Perdata.html, accesed November 20, 2024Google Scholar ↗
H. Arpani. Peran Hakim Dalam Penemuan Hukum Dan Penciptaan Hukum Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Di Pengadilan. 5 April 2013. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/peran-hakim-dalam-penemuan-hukum-dan-penciptaan-hukum-dalam-menyelesaikan-perkara-di-pengadilan-oleh-drs-h-arpani-sh-mh-64, accesed November 20, 2024Google Scholar ↗
Simanjuntak, Enrico. (2019). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia the Roles of Case Law in Indonesian Legal System. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 1, Maret 2019, p. 84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1615DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Nurhayati, Yati. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media, p. 73.Google Scholar ↗
Asshidiqie, Jimly. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, cet. ke-5, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, p. 126.Google Scholar ↗
Simanjuntak, Enrico. (2018). Praktek Yurisprudensi Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Sistem Civil Law. Jakarta Selatan: Indonesian Judicial Reform Forum.Google Scholar ↗
Huda, Miftakhul. (2010). Yurisprudensi, Majalah Konstitusi Edisi April 2010, p. 86.Google Scholar ↗
https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/yurisprudensi-cl1679/, accesed November 22, 2024Google Scholar ↗
Sujono, Imam. Urgensi Penemuan Hukum dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1835. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 18, Nomor 3, September 2021, p. 588.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Setyawan Bima Agrianto. Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Akta Jual Beli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2931 K/PDT/2016), Jurnal Verstek, Volume 7, Nomor 3, 2019, p. 199.Google Scholar ↗
Panjaitan, Hulman. (2014). Kumpulan Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Putusan MARI Tahun 1953-2008 Berdasarkan Penggolongannya. Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, p. 66.Google Scholar ↗
Boediarto, M. Ali. (2005). Kompilasi Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung Hukum Acara Perdata: Masa Setengah Abad. Jakarta: Swara Justisia, p. 152-153.Google Scholar ↗
Cassation Decision Number 654 K/Pdt.Sus/2011, p. 28.Google Scholar ↗
Depok Religious Court Decision Number 3424/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Dpk., p. 16.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-1] Imas Rosidawati Wiradirja et.al. Reviewing the Ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Concerning the Requirements for President and Vice President Candidates in the Perspective of Progressive Law. (2024). International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12(07), 521. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i07.lla01DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] Ali, Achmad. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Jakarta: Kencana, p. 15.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] Aprilia Aprilia, Claresta Devina Valencia & Dave David Tedjokusumo. Analisis Yuridis Penyalahgunaan Surat Kuasa Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pembuktian. IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Analisis Yuridis Volume 5 Nomor 2, Juni – September 2024: Page 584Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] Fakhriah, Efa Laela. (2016). Perbandingan HIR dan RBg Sebagai Hukum Acara Perdata Positif di Indonesia. Bandung: Keni Media, p. 11.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] Ninung Rusalia Hikmah, Marjo, Lapon Tukan Leonard. Pembuktian Dengan Alat Bukti Akta Dibawah Tangan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal Volume 9, Nomor 2, Tahun 2020, p. 467.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/glosarium-hukum/2192-actori-in-combit-probatio, accesed November 20, 2024Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] Decision of the Surabaya District Court Number 329/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby, p. 120.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] Cassation Decision Number 1800 K/Pdt/2023, p. 18.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] Soeroso, R. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata Lengkap dan Praktis HIR, Rbg., dan Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, p. 118.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] Puspita Sari, Devina. Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Surat yang Tidak Dapat Dicocokkan dengan Aslinya dalam Perkara Perdata. Undang: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): 340, DOI: 10.22437/ujh.2.2.323-352DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] Tejo, E. S., Kurniati, Y., & RAS, H. (2024). Criminological Review of the Crime of Prostitution in a Group of Sexual Fantasy Performer on Social Media. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 5(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v5i2.1511DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] Fakhriah, Efa Laela. (2019). Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, p. 45.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] Subekti. (2003). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, p. 17.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] Manan, Abdul. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana, p. 228.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-15] Harahap M. Yahya. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cet. Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, p. 498.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-16] Effendie Lotulung, Paulus. (1998). Peranan Yurisprudensi Sebagai Sumber Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, p. 12-13.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-17] A.Muhtarom. Menjadi Hakim Ideal Dalam Pengambilan Putusan. 03 March 2023 https://www.pa-kebumen.go.id/berita-pusat/419-menjadi-hakim-ideal-dalam-pengambilan-putusan, accesed November 18, 2024Google Scholar ↗

[refR-18] Helmy Abi Nugraha. Pembuktian dalam Hukum Perdata. 26 September 2023. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-batam/baca-artikel/16467/Pembuktian-dalam-Hukum-Perdata.html, accesed November 20, 2024Google Scholar ↗

[refR-19] H. Arpani. Peran Hakim Dalam Penemuan Hukum Dan Penciptaan Hukum Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Di Pengadilan. 5 April 2013. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/peran-hakim-dalam-penemuan-hukum-dan-penciptaan-hukum-dalam-menyelesaikan-perkara-di-pengadilan-oleh-drs-h-arpani-sh-mh-64, accesed November 20, 2024Google Scholar ↗

[refR-20] Simanjuntak, Enrico. (2019). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia the Roles of Case Law in Indonesian Legal System. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 1, Maret 2019, p. 84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1615DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-21] Nurhayati, Yati. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media, p. 73.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-22] Asshidiqie, Jimly. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, cet. ke-5, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, p. 126.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-23] Simanjuntak, Enrico. (2018). Praktek Yurisprudensi Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Sistem Civil Law. Jakarta Selatan: Indonesian Judicial Reform Forum.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-24] Huda, Miftakhul. (2010). Yurisprudensi, Majalah Konstitusi Edisi April 2010, p. 86.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-25] https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/yurisprudensi-cl1679/, accesed November 22, 2024Google Scholar ↗

[refR-26] Sujono, Imam. Urgensi Penemuan Hukum dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1835. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 18, Nomor 3, September 2021, p. 588.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-27] Setyawan Bima Agrianto. Kekuatan Pembuktian Fotokopi Akta Jual Beli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2931 K/PDT/2016), Jurnal Verstek, Volume 7, Nomor 3, 2019, p. 199.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-28] Panjaitan, Hulman. (2014). Kumpulan Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Putusan MARI Tahun 1953-2008 Berdasarkan Penggolongannya. Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, p. 66.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-29] Boediarto, M. Ali. (2005). Kompilasi Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung Hukum Acara Perdata: Masa Setengah Abad. Jakarta: Swara Justisia, p. 152-153.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-30] Cassation Decision Number 654 K/Pdt.Sus/2011, p. 28.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-31] Depok Religious Court Decision Number 3424/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Dpk., p. 16.Google Scholar ↗