A Study on The Characteristics of Computer Mouse Used By Vietnamese University Students in Academic and Research Activities

Hoang Thanh Thuy; Nguyen Thu Trang; Kim Khue

doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v13i04.as01

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the compatibility between computer mouse size and hand size of university students in Vietnam. Three popular types of computer mice on the market were selected for analysis, with the participation of 200 students in the survey and measurement process. The research results show that the type of computer mice preferred by Vietnamese students are medium-sized Logitech mice with a price range from 100,000 to 500,000 VND. They often have the habit of using the mouse for an average of 3 to 5 hours per day; following the Claw Grip posture on mice with a slightly symmetrical design and a height that fits the palm. The hands of male and female Vietnamese students have an average length of 16.4 – 17.8 cm and an average width of 6.9 – 7.5 cm. With such hand dimensions, mice with a length ranging from 10 to 11.5 cm would be suitable.

Keywords

studentcomputer mousecarpal tunnel syndromeergonomic…

References

Albin, T. & Molenbroek, J. (2023). Introduction to the Special Issue, Anthropometry in Design. Ergonomics in Design.Google Scholar ↗
Yang, Y., Zhou, H., Song, Y., & Vink, P.(2021). Identify dominant dimensions of 3D hand shapes using statistical shape model and deep neural network. Applied Ergonomics.[source]Google Scholar ↗
Wen, J., Wang, J., Xu, Q., Wei, Y., Zhang, L.,Ou, J., & Tong, M. (2020). Hand anthropometry and its relation to grip/pinch strength in children aged 5 to 13 years. Journal of International Medical Research, 48(12),0300060520970768.Google Scholar ↗
Rincón-Becerra, O. & García-Acosta, G.(2020). Estimation of anthropometric hand measurements using the ratio scaling method for the design of sewn gloves. Dyna.Google Scholar ↗
Dr. Ngan Pham Thi Bich, MSc. Hien Nguyen Thi, and colleagues. Survey Results on Certain Anthropometric Indicators (Static Indicators) of Vietnamese Workers in the Current Period. Journal of Science and Technology Activities on Occupational Safety, Health, and Environment, Issues 1, 2 & 3, 2020.Google Scholar ↗
https://www.daskeyboard.com/blog/claw-grip-palm-grip-fingertip-grip-mouse-grips/Google Scholar ↗
Anh, L.T.N., Cuc, N.T.K., Hien, P.T., Nga, T.T., Van Doanh, T., Hieu, T.M. (2022). Research on the Characteristics of the Length, Breadth, and Diagonal Hand Dimensions of Male Students by Indirect Measurement Method. In: Khang, N.V., Hoang, N.Q., Ceccarelli, M. (eds) Advances in Asian Mechanism and Machine Science. ASIAN MMS 2021. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91892-7_61DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Bui Van Huan ,Do Thi Hoa Nga. Research on Establishing the Hand Size System of Hung Yen Female Students for Leather Glove Design. Journal of Science and Technology, Hanoi University of Industry .140 (2020) 025-030.Google Scholar ↗
Pham, T. T. V., Tran, N. A., & Vu, D. T. (2022). Research anthropometry of hand, upper limbs, height,and weight of Thai Binh Medical University. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.V20220506DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Erin HughesPeter Wallace JohnsonPeter Wallace Johnson. Child Computer Use and Anthropometry. Conference: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVolume: pp 1716-1719. DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551356DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
E. Fernström and M. O. Ericson, 1997. Computer mouse or Trackpoint - Effects on muscular load and operator experience. Appl. Ergon., vol. 28, no. 5–6, pp. 347–354Google Scholar ↗
E. Gustafsson and M. Hagberg, 2004. Computer Mouse Use in Two Different Hand. Positions: Exposure, Comfort, Exertion and Productivity. Appl. Ergon., vol. 34, no. 2, pp.107–113Google Scholar ↗
A. Delisle, D. Imbeau, B. Santos, A. Plamondon, and Y. Montpetit, 2004. Left-handed versus right-handed computer mouse use: Effect on upper-extremity posture. Appl. Ergon., vol. 35, no. 1, pp.21–28.Google Scholar ↗
C. Jensen, V. Borg, L. Finsen, K. Hansen, B. Juul-Kristensen, and C. H, 2008. Job Demands, Muscle Activity and Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Relation to Work with the Computer Mouse. Scand J Work Env. Heal., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 418–424.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-1] Albin, T. & Molenbroek, J. (2023). Introduction to the Special Issue, Anthropometry in Design. Ergonomics in Design.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] Yang, Y., Zhou, H., Song, Y., & Vink, P.(2021). Identify dominant dimensions of 3D hand shapes using statistical shape model and deep neural network. Applied Ergonomics.[source]Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] Wen, J., Wang, J., Xu, Q., Wei, Y., Zhang, L.,Ou, J., & Tong, M. (2020). Hand anthropometry and its relation to grip/pinch strength in children aged 5 to 13 years. Journal of International Medical Research, 48(12),0300060520970768.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] Rincón-Becerra, O. & García-Acosta, G.(2020). Estimation of anthropometric hand measurements using the ratio scaling method for the design of sewn gloves. Dyna.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] Dr. Ngan Pham Thi Bich, MSc. Hien Nguyen Thi, and colleagues. Survey Results on Certain Anthropometric Indicators (Static Indicators) of Vietnamese Workers in the Current Period. Journal of Science and Technology Activities on Occupational Safety, Health, and Environment, Issues 1, 2 & 3, 2020.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] https://www.daskeyboard.com/blog/claw-grip-palm-grip-fingertip-grip-mouse-grips/Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] Anh, L.T.N., Cuc, N.T.K., Hien, P.T., Nga, T.T., Van Doanh, T., Hieu, T.M. (2022). Research on the Characteristics of the Length, Breadth, and Diagonal Hand Dimensions of Male Students by Indirect Measurement Method. In: Khang, N.V., Hoang, N.Q., Ceccarelli, M. (eds) Advances in Asian Mechanism and Machine Science. ASIAN MMS 2021. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91892-7_61DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] Bui Van Huan ,Do Thi Hoa Nga. Research on Establishing the Hand Size System of Hung Yen Female Students for Leather Glove Design. Journal of Science and Technology, Hanoi University of Industry .140 (2020) 025-030.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] Pham, T. T. V., Tran, N. A., & Vu, D. T. (2022). Research anthropometry of hand, upper limbs, height,and weight of Thai Binh Medical University. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.V20220506DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] Erin HughesPeter Wallace JohnsonPeter Wallace Johnson. Child Computer Use and Anthropometry. Conference: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVolume: pp 1716-1719. DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551356DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] E. Fernström and M. O. Ericson, 1997. Computer mouse or Trackpoint - Effects on muscular load and operator experience. Appl. Ergon., vol. 28, no. 5–6, pp. 347–354Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] E. Gustafsson and M. Hagberg, 2004. Computer Mouse Use in Two Different Hand. Positions: Exposure, Comfort, Exertion and Productivity. Appl. Ergon., vol. 34, no. 2, pp.107–113Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] A. Delisle, D. Imbeau, B. Santos, A. Plamondon, and Y. Montpetit, 2004. Left-handed versus right-handed computer mouse use: Effect on upper-extremity posture. Appl. Ergon., vol. 35, no. 1, pp.21–28.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] C. Jensen, V. Borg, L. Finsen, K. Hansen, B. Juul-Kristensen, and C. H, 2008. Job Demands, Muscle Activity and Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Relation to Work with the Computer Mouse. Scand J Work Env. Heal., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 418–424.Google Scholar ↗