Abstract
This research explores the critical influence of green intellectual capital (GIC), green dynamic capabilities (GDC), and green innovation on the environmental performance of manufacturing firms. In light of escalating global environmental challenges, companies are increasingly urged to implement sustainable practices to secure their competitive advantages. This study posits that GIC—comprising the intangible assets related to environmental knowledge and capabilities—alongside green innovation, which represents advancements in eco-friendly technologies, plays a vital role in improving environmental performance. Employing structural equation modeling (SEM) through AMOS, data were gathered from the Top Management Teams (TMT) of manufacturing companies in the Riau Islands, Indonesia. The analysis reveals that both GIC and GDC have a significant positive impact on environmental performance, suggesting that firms that prioritize environmental competencies and knowledge achieve enhanced sustainability metrics. Additionally, green innovation is shown to elevate both environmental performance and competitive advantage. These findings highlight the necessity for organizations and policymakers to foster intellectual capital development and innovative practices as integral components of sustainable business models, thereby addressing ecological challenges effectively.
Keywords
References
- Abrudan, D. B., Rafi, N., Daianu, D. C., & Kalyar, M. N. (2022). Linking green intellectual capital with green innovation: Examining the roles of green dynamic capabilities and “motivation to achieve legitimacy.” Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 68(7), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/97/2022-AGRICECONDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Abu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023). Green human resource management and environmental performance: The role of green innovation and environmental strategy in a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1782–1798. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3219DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Akhtar, S., Li, C., Sohu, J. M., Rasool, Y., Hassan, M. I. U., & Bilal, M. (2024). Unlocking green innovation and environmental performance: the mediated moderation of green absorptive capacity and green innovation climate. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 31(3), 4547–4562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31403-wDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Ali, S., Wu, W., & Ali, S. (2021). Adaptive marketing capability and product innovations: the role of market ambidexterity and transformational leadership (evidence from Pakistani manufacturing industry). European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2020-0520DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Asghar, B., Wasim, A., Qazi, U., & Rasool, A. (2020). Financial and non-financial practices driving sustainable firm performance: Evidence from banking sector of developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156164DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2875DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Asiaei, K., O’Connor, N. G., Barani, O., & Joshi, M. (2023). Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3136DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Benevene, P., Buonomo, I., Kong, E., Pansini, M., & Farnese, M. L. (2021). Management of green intellectual capital: Evidence-based literature review and future directions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158349DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Block, S., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., & Wendling, Z. (2024). The Environmental Performance Index 2024. 1–191. https://epi.yale.eduGoogle Scholar ↗
- Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2021). Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63751–63768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11379-7DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. In John Wiley & Sons. (Vol. 26, Issue 2). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90168-fDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Alam, G. M., Ashfaq, K., & Usman, M. (2023). Environmental MCS package, perceived environmental uncertainty and green performance: in green dynamic capabilities and investment in environmental management perspectives. Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-01-2022-0005DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.299DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Carrión-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Thrassou, A., & Sakka, G. (2022). Impact of firm’s intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms and the moderating effects of age and gender. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2020-0378DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Chuang, S. P., & Huang, S. J. (2018). The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3167-xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Climate Change Performance Index. (2024). Indonesia - Climate change performance index. Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute, and Climate Action Network.Google Scholar ↗
- Dong, T., Yin, S., & Zhang, N. (2023). New Energy-Driven Construction Industry: Digital Green Innovation Investment Project Selection of Photovoltaic Building Materials Enterprises Using an Integrated Fuzzy Decision Approach. Systems, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010011DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Dougherty, D. (1992). A practice‐centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1 S), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131007DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Du, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Green Innovation Sustainability: How Green Market Orientation and Absorptive Capacity Matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138192DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(November), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Forés, B., Puig-Denia, A., Fernández-Yáñez, J. M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and environmental performance: all in the family. Management Decision, 61(13), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2022-1344DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Method (5th ed.). Centre for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar ↗
- Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2000). Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 961–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<961::aid-smj132>3.0.co;2-eDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Hermawan, A., & Yusran, husna lelila. (2017). Penelitian Bisnis pendekatan kuantitatif. In Kencana. Depok: Kencana.Google Scholar ↗
- Hoang, T. N., & Truong, C. B. (2024). Investigating the mediating role of green performance measurement systems in the nexus between green intellectual capital and environmental performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(10), 2237–2258. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2023-0663DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Jirakraisiri, J., Badir, Y. F., & Frank, B. (2021). Translating green strategic intent into green process innovation performance: the role of green intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(7), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0277DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Kertahadi, R. S. A., & Dwiatmanto. (2014). ANALISIS SISTEM AKUNTANSI PENGGAJIAN DAN PENGUPAHAN DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN EFEKTIVITAS PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL PERUSAHAAN. Implementation Science, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315853178DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Kumar, J., Rani, V., Rani, M., & Rani, G. (2025). Linking green intellectual capital and firm performance through green innovation and environmental performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2024-0345DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Kuo, Y. K., Khan, T. I., Islam, S. U., Abdullah, F. Z., Pradana, M., & Kaewsaeng-on, R. (2022). Impact of Green HRM Practices on Environmental Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916723DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Li, D., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Cao, C. (2018). Impact of quality management on green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.158DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Liu, C. C. (2010). Developing green intellectual capital in companies by AHP. SCMIS 2010 - Proceedings of 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information Systems: Logistics Systems and Engineering.Google Scholar ↗
- Ma, L., Ali, A., Shahzad, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Factors of green innovation: the role of dynamic capabilities and knowledge sharing through green creativity. Kybernetes, 21. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0911DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Mansoor, A., Jahan, S., & Riaz, M. (2021). Does green intellectual capital spur corporate environmental performance through green workforce? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2020-0181DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Lee, K. (2024). Green intellectual capital and environmental performance: identifying the pivotal role of green ambidexterity innovation and top management environmental awareness. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2023-0193DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Masoulas, V. (1998). Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capital management. International Journal of Technology Management, 16(1–3), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.1998.002655DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Ranson, S., & Stewart, J. (1994). Management for the Public Domain: Enabling the Learning Society. St. Martin’s Press, 1994. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Management_for_the_Public_Domain.html?id=bx4oAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=yGoogle Scholar ↗
- Rehman, S. U., Kraus, S., Shah, S. A., Khanin, D., & Mahto, R. V. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163(xxxx), 120481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120481DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Reyes-Santiago, M. del R., Sánchez-Medina, P. S., & Díaz-Pichardo, R. (2019). The influence of environmental dynamic capabilities on organizational and environmental performance of hotels: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.245DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Rezende, L. de A., Bansi, A. C., Alves, M. F. R., & Galina, S. V. R. (2019). Take your time: Examining when green innovation affects financial performance in multinationals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.135DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Riaz, M., Jie, W., Sherani, Ali, S., & Chang, S. (2024). Assessing the role of organizational strategic factors in stimulating green innovation performance: moderating effects of green absorptive capacity. Business Process Management Journal, 30(4), 1013–1043. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2023-0967DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Sarwar, A., & Mustafa, A. (2023). Analysing the impact of green intellectual capital on environmental performance: the mediating role of green training and development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, May, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2209205DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Shah, S. M. M., Ahmed, U., Ismail, A. I., & Mozammel, S. (2021). Going intellectually green: Exploring the nexus between green intellectual capital, environmental responsibility, and environmental concern towards environmental performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116257DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Shahbaz, M. H., & Malik, S. A. (2025). Exploring the role of green intellectual capital and HRM: green innovation and environmental performance intensify competitive advantage. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2024-0270DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1445DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Tran, T. D., Huan, D. M., Phan, T. T. H., & Do, H. L. (2023). The impact of green intellectual capital on green innovation in Vietnamese textile and garment enterprises: mediate role of environmental knowledge and moderating impact of green social behavior and learning outcomes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(30), 74952–74965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27523-yDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Ullah, H., Wang, Z., Mohsin, M., Jiang, W., & Abbas, H. (2022). Multidimensional perspective of green financial innovation between green intellectual capital on sustainable business: the case of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5552–5568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15919-7DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Wang, C. H., & Juo, W. J. (2021). An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241–3254. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2800DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Yadiati, W., Nissa, Paulus, S., Suharman, H., & Meiryani. (2019). The role of green intellectual capital and organizational reputation in influencing environmental performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7752DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Yin, S., Zhang, N., Ullah, K., & Gao, S. (2022). Enhancing Digital Innovation for the Sustainable Transformation of Manufacturing Industry: A Pressure‐State‐Response System Framework to Perceptions of Digital Green Innovation and Its Performance for Green and Intelligent Manufacturing. Systems, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030072DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Yu, D., Tao, S., Hanan, A., Ong, T. S., Latif, B., & Ali, M. (2022). Fostering Green Innovation Adoption through Green Dynamic Capability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism and Big Data Analytic Capability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610336DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Yusliza, M. Y., Norazmi, N. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Fernando, Y., Fawehinmi, O., & Seles, B. M. R. P. (2019). Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management: A Malaysian study. Benchmarking, 26(6), 2051–2078. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0283DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Zaid, M. A. A., Issa, A., Deari, F., Kijkasiwat, P., & Kumar, V. (2024). Does corporate green innovation unlock financial doors? The mediating role of environmental performance. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2024-0048DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗