Green Intellectual Capital and Innovation: Keys to Sustainable Environmental Performance in Manufacturing
Downloads
This research explores the critical influence of green intellectual capital (GIC), green dynamic capabilities (GDC), and green innovation on the environmental performance of manufacturing firms. In light of escalating global environmental challenges, companies are increasingly urged to implement sustainable practices to secure their competitive advantages. This study posits that GIC—comprising the intangible assets related to environmental knowledge and capabilities—alongside green innovation, which represents advancements in eco-friendly technologies, plays a vital role in improving environmental performance. Employing structural equation modeling (SEM) through AMOS, data were gathered from the Top Management Teams (TMT) of manufacturing companies in the Riau Islands, Indonesia. The analysis reveals that both GIC and GDC have a significant positive impact on environmental performance, suggesting that firms that prioritize environmental competencies and knowledge achieve enhanced sustainability metrics. Additionally, green innovation is shown to elevate both environmental performance and competitive advantage. These findings highlight the necessity for organizations and policymakers to foster intellectual capital development and innovative practices as integral components of sustainable business models, thereby addressing ecological challenges effectively.
Downloads
1. Abrudan, D. B., Rafi, N., Daianu, D. C., & Kalyar, M. N. (2022). Linking green intellectual capital with green innovation: Examining the roles of green dynamic capabilities and “motivation to achieve legitimacy.” Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 68(7), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/97/2022-AGRICECON
2. Abu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211
3. Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023). Green human resource management and environmental performance: The role of green innovation and environmental strategy in a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1782–1798. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3219
4. Akhtar, S., Li, C., Sohu, J. M., Rasool, Y., Hassan, M. I. U., & Bilal, M. (2024). Unlocking green innovation and environmental performance: the mediated moderation of green absorptive capacity and green innovation climate. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 31(3), 4547–4562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31403-w
5. Ali, S., Wu, W., & Ali, S. (2021). Adaptive marketing capability and product innovations: the role of market ambidexterity and transformational leadership (evidence from Pakistani manufacturing industry). European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2020-0520
6. Asghar, B., Wasim, A., Qazi, U., & Rasool, A. (2020). Financial and non-financial practices driving sustainable firm performance: Evidence from banking sector of developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156164
7. Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2875
8. Asiaei, K., O’Connor, N. G., Barani, O., & Joshi, M. (2023). Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3136
9. Benevene, P., Buonomo, I., Kong, E., Pansini, M., & Farnese, M. L. (2021). Management of green intellectual capital: Evidence-based literature review and future directions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158349
10. Block, S., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., & Wendling, Z. (2024). The Environmental Performance Index 2024. 1–191. https://epi.yale.edu
11. Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2021). Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63751–63768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11379-7
12. Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. In John Wiley & Sons. (Vol. 26, Issue 2). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90168-f
13. Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Alam, G. M., Ashfaq, K., & Usman, M. (2023). Environmental MCS package, perceived environmental uncertainty and green performance: in green dynamic capabilities and investment in environmental management perspectives. Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-01-2022-0005
14. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.299
15. Carrión-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.003
16. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Thrassou, A., & Sakka, G. (2022). Impact of firm’s intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms and the moderating effects of age and gender. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2020-0378
17. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x
18. Chuang, S. P., & Huang, S. J. (2018). The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x
19. Climate Change Performance Index. (2024). Indonesia - Climate change performance index. Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute, and Climate Action Network.
20. Dong, T., Yin, S., & Zhang, N. (2023). New Energy-Driven Construction Industry: Digital Green Innovation Investment Project Selection of Photovoltaic Building Materials Enterprises Using an Integrated Fuzzy Decision Approach. Systems, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010011
21. Dougherty, D. (1992). A practice‐centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1 S), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131007
22. Du, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Green Innovation Sustainability: How Green Market Orientation and Absorptive Capacity Matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138192
23. El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144(November), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016
24. Forés, B., Puig-Denia, A., Fernández-Yáñez, J. M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and environmental performance: all in the family. Management Decision, 61(13), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2022-1344
25. Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Method (5th ed.). Centre for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts.
26. Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2000). Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 961–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<961::aid-smj132>3.0.co;2-e
27. Hermawan, A., & Yusran, husna lelila. (2017). Penelitian Bisnis pendekatan kuantitatif. In Kencana. Depok: Kencana.
28. Hoang, T. N., & Truong, C. B. (2024). Investigating the mediating role of green performance measurement systems in the nexus between green intellectual capital and environmental performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(10), 2237–2258. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2023-0663
29. Jirakraisiri, J., Badir, Y. F., & Frank, B. (2021). Translating green strategic intent into green process innovation performance: the role of green intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(7), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0277
30. Kertahadi, R. S. A., & Dwiatmanto. (2014). ANALISIS SISTEM AKUNTANSI PENGGAJIAN DAN PENGUPAHAN DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN EFEKTIVITAS PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL PERUSAHAAN. Implementation Science, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315853178
31. Kumar, J., Rani, V., Rani, M., & Rani, G. (2025). Linking green intellectual capital and firm performance through green innovation and environmental performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2024-0345
32. Kuo, Y. K., Khan, T. I., Islam, S. U., Abdullah, F. Z., Pradana, M., & Kaewsaeng-on, R. (2022). Impact of Green HRM Practices on Environmental Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916723
33. Li, D., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Cao, C. (2018). Impact of quality management on green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.158
34. Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123
35. Liu, C. C. (2010). Developing green intellectual capital in companies by AHP. SCMIS 2010 - Proceedings of 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information Systems: Logistics Systems and Engineering.
36. Ma, L., Ali, A., Shahzad, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Factors of green innovation: the role of dynamic capabilities and knowledge sharing through green creativity. Kybernetes, 21. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0911
37. Mansoor, A., Jahan, S., & Riaz, M. (2021). Does green intellectual capital spur corporate environmental performance through green workforce? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(5), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2020-0181
38. Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Lee, K. (2024). Green intellectual capital and environmental performance: identifying the pivotal role of green ambidexterity innovation and top management environmental awareness. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2023-0193
39. Masoulas, V. (1998). Organizational requirements definition for intellectual capital management. International Journal of Technology Management, 16(1–3), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.1998.002655
40. Ranson, S., & Stewart, J. (1994). Management for the Public Domain: Enabling the Learning Society. St. Martin’s Press, 1994. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Management_for_the_Public_Domain.html?id=bx4oAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
41. Rehman, S. U., Kraus, S., Shah, S. A., Khanin, D., & Mahto, R. V. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163(xxxx), 120481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120481
42. Reyes-Santiago, M. del R., Sánchez-Medina, P. S., & Díaz-Pichardo, R. (2019). The influence of environmental dynamic capabilities on organizational and environmental performance of hotels: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.245
43. Rezende, L. de A., Bansi, A. C., Alves, M. F. R., & Galina, S. V. R. (2019). Take your time: Examining when green innovation affects financial performance in multinationals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.135
44. Riaz, M., Jie, W., Sherani, Ali, S., & Chang, S. (2024). Assessing the role of organizational strategic factors in stimulating green innovation performance: moderating effects of green absorptive capacity. Business Process Management Journal, 30(4), 1013–1043. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2023-0967
45. Sarwar, A., & Mustafa, A. (2023). Analysing the impact of green intellectual capital on environmental performance: the mediating role of green training and development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, May, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2209205
46. Shah, S. M. M., Ahmed, U., Ismail, A. I., & Mozammel, S. (2021). Going intellectually green: Exploring the nexus between green intellectual capital, environmental responsibility, and environmental concern towards environmental performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116257
47. Shahbaz, M. H., & Malik, S. A. (2025). Exploring the role of green intellectual capital and HRM: green innovation and environmental performance intensify competitive advantage. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2024-0270
48. Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1445
49. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
50. Tran, T. D., Huan, D. M., Phan, T. T. H., & Do, H. L. (2023). The impact of green intellectual capital on green innovation in Vietnamese textile and garment enterprises: mediate role of environmental knowledge and moderating impact of green social behavior and learning outcomes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(30), 74952–74965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27523-y
51. Ullah, H., Wang, Z., Mohsin, M., Jiang, W., & Abbas, H. (2022). Multidimensional perspective of green financial innovation between green intellectual capital on sustainable business: the case of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5552–5568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15919-7
52. Wang, C. H., & Juo, W. J. (2021). An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3241–3254. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2800
53. Yadiati, W., Nissa, Paulus, S., Suharman, H., & Meiryani. (2019). The role of green intellectual capital and organizational reputation in influencing environmental performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7752
54. Yin, S., Zhang, N., Ullah, K., & Gao, S. (2022). Enhancing Digital Innovation for the Sustainable Transformation of Manufacturing Industry: A Pressure‐State‐Response System Framework to Perceptions of Digital Green Innovation and Its Performance for Green and Intelligent Manufacturing. Systems, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030072
55. Yu, D., Tao, S., Hanan, A., Ong, T. S., Latif, B., & Ali, M. (2022). Fostering Green Innovation Adoption through Green Dynamic Capability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism and Big Data Analytic Capability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610336
56. Yusliza, M. Y., Norazmi, N. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Fernando, Y., Fawehinmi, O., & Seles, B. M. R. P. (2019). Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management: A Malaysian study. Benchmarking, 26(6), 2051–2078. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0283
57. Zaid, M. A. A., Issa, A., Deari, F., Kijkasiwat, P., & Kumar, V. (2024). Does corporate green innovation unlock financial doors? The mediating role of environmental performance. European Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2024-0048
Copyright (c) 2025 Mariska Ramadana, Yolanda Masnita, Husna Leila Yusran, Teddy Jurnali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
