Examining Effectiveness of Reforestation Policy in Public Institutions on Environmental Conservation

Mark Siwale; Clement Katongo

doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v13i05.sh02

Abstract

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of reforestation policies in public institutions, focusing on environmental conservation through a case study of the Forestry Department in Chilanga. It assesses policy impacts on deforestation, stakeholder coordination, and sustainability. The descriptive design targeted 20 community members, 10 local government officers, 10 NGO representatives, and 10 forestry officers. Probability sampling was used, and data were collected via structured questionnaires, analyzed using SPSS, and presented through frequency tables and pie charts. Findings highlight that reforestation policies significantly address deforestation and improve socio-economic conditions by restoring land, creating jobs, and enhancing climate resilience, water quality, and biodiversity. However, successful implementation requires better funding, effective stakeholder engagement, and clear policy guidelines. While coordination among stakeholders was generally effective, 20% noted the need for improved conflict resolution and communication. The main barriers identified were limited resources and inadequate community involvement. Financial stability emerged as the most critical factor for sustainability, with 55% of respondents emphasizing the need for consistent funding. Community engagement (30%) and policy support (15%) were also crucial. Recommendations include securing reliable funding, enhancing stakeholder communication, and improving conflict resolution for sustainable reforestation efforts.

Key Terms: Reforestation Policy, Public Institutions, Environmental Conservation, Forestry, Mitigating Deforestation, Stakeholders And Sustainability.

References

Bryner, G. C. (2003). Environmental Policy and Politics in the United States: Toward Sustainability. CRC Press.Google Scholar ↗
Dietz, T., et al. (2005). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.Google Scholar ↗
Hirose, Y., et al. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Local Environmental Sustainability Policy in the US: A Survey-Based Approach. Sustainability, 9(12), 2199.Google Scholar ↗
Meijer, A. J. (2019). Digital Government: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 679–689.Google Scholar ↗
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
Susskind, L., et al. (2002). Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Quantifying Biodiversity Conservation of Land Use Policies in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(17), 10264–10273.Google Scholar ↗
DEFRA. (2019). Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England's wildlife and ecosystem services.Google Scholar ↗
Federal Ministry for the Environment. (2022). Germany's National Forest Programme.Google Scholar ↗
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (n.d.). Global Forest Resources Assessment.Google Scholar ↗
Forestry Commission. (2020). Forestry Statistics 2020.Google Scholar ↗
IUCN. (2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Google Scholar ↗
Johnson, K., & Wilson, G. (2019). Reforestation and Afforestation: Drivers, Trends, and Impacts. Environmental Management, 63(4), 531-544.Google Scholar ↗
Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources. (2023). Zambia's Reforestation Efforts.Google Scholar ↗
Mwitwa, J., Mwitwa, J., & Mwitwa, J. (2019). Community-led Reforestation in Zambia: Lessons and Challenges. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 38(5), 439-453.Google Scholar ↗
Turpie, J., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J. (2017). The Working for Water programme: A review of its impact on invasive alien plant control and biodiversity conservation in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 109, 21-31.Google Scholar ↗
ZEMA. (2022). State of Zambia's Forests Report.Google Scholar ↗
ZFC. (2022). Annual Report.Google Scholar ↗
Ajewole, O. I., et al. (2020). Multi-stakeholder forums for effective coordination and improved reforestation outcomes in the Niger Delta region.Google Scholar ↗
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business Research Methods.Google Scholar ↗
Butler, W. H., et al. (2019). Collaborative governance for reforestation: A case study of the National Forest System's stakeholder engagement process.Google Scholar ↗
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education.Google Scholar ↗
Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.Google Scholar ↗
Flick, U. (2017). Designing Qualitative Research.Google Scholar ↗
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research.Google Scholar ↗
Frankfort-Nachmias, C. (2020). Research Methods in the Social Sciences.Google Scholar ↗
Johnson, K., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches.Google Scholar ↗
Kalinda, T., et al. (2018). Zambia's Reforestation Policy Framework: An Analysis.Google Scholar ↗
Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.Google Scholar ↗
Liu, J., et al. (2018). Public-led Reforestation Efforts in China: An Evaluation.Google Scholar ↗
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.Google Scholar ↗
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook.Google Scholar ↗
Mugwagwa, V., et al. (2020). Public Institutions' Reforestation Programs in Zimbabwe: An Assessment.Google Scholar ↗
Mwitwa, J., et al. (2019). Community-led Reforestation in Zambia: Lessons and Challenges.Google Scholar ↗
Nachmias, C. (2015). Research Methods in the Social Sciences.Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.Google Scholar ↗
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students.Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology.Google Scholar ↗
Ng'onga, M., Kalaba, F.K., Mwitwa, J. and Bright, N., 2019. The interactive effects of rainfall, temperature and water level on fish yield in Lake Bangweulu fishery, Zambia. Journal of Thermal Biology. 84: 45-Google Scholar ↗
Ng'onga, M., Kalaba, F.K. and Mwitwa, J., 2019. The contribution of fisheries-based households to the local economy (Capital and Labour) and national fish yield: A case of Lake Bangweulu fishery, Zambia. Scientific African, 5, p.e00120.Google Scholar ↗
England, M. I., Dougill, A. J., Stringer, L. C., Vincent, K. E., Pardoe, J., Kalaba, F.K., Mkwambisi, D.D.,Namaganda, E., Afionis, S. (2018). Climate change adaptation and cross-sectoral policy coherence in Southern Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 1-13. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1283-0DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Willemen, L., Crossman, N.D., Quatrini, S., Egoh, B., Kalaba. F.K., Mbilinyi, B., de Groot, R. (2018). Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for targeting land degradation neutrality investments in southeastern Africa, Journal of Arid Environments. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.05.009DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-1] Bryner, G. C. (2003). Environmental Policy and Politics in the United States: Toward Sustainability. CRC Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] Dietz, T., et al. (2005). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] Hirose, Y., et al. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Local Environmental Sustainability Policy in the US: A Survey-Based Approach. Sustainability, 9(12), 2199.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] Meijer, A. J. (2019). Digital Government: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 679–689.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] Susskind, L., et al. (2002). Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Quantifying Biodiversity Conservation of Land Use Policies in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(17), 10264–10273.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] DEFRA. (2019). Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England's wildlife and ecosystem services.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] Federal Ministry for the Environment. (2022). Germany's National Forest Programme.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (n.d.). Global Forest Resources Assessment.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] Forestry Commission. (2020). Forestry Statistics 2020.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] IUCN. (2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] Johnson, K., & Wilson, G. (2019). Reforestation and Afforestation: Drivers, Trends, and Impacts. Environmental Management, 63(4), 531-544.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources. (2023). Zambia's Reforestation Efforts.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-15] Mwitwa, J., Mwitwa, J., & Mwitwa, J. (2019). Community-led Reforestation in Zambia: Lessons and Challenges. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 38(5), 439-453.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-16] Turpie, J., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J. (2017). The Working for Water programme: A review of its impact on invasive alien plant control and biodiversity conservation in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 109, 21-31.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-17] ZEMA. (2022). State of Zambia's Forests Report.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-18] ZFC. (2022). Annual Report.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-19] Ajewole, O. I., et al. (2020). Multi-stakeholder forums for effective coordination and improved reforestation outcomes in the Niger Delta region.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-20] Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business Research Methods.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-21] Butler, W. H., et al. (2019). Collaborative governance for reforestation: A case study of the National Forest System's stakeholder engagement process.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-22] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-23] Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-24] Flick, U. (2017). Designing Qualitative Research.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-25] Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-26] Frankfort-Nachmias, C. (2020). Research Methods in the Social Sciences.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-27] Johnson, K., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-28] Kalinda, T., et al. (2018). Zambia's Reforestation Policy Framework: An Analysis.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-29] Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-30] Liu, J., et al. (2018). Public-led Reforestation Efforts in China: An Evaluation.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-31] Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-32] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-33] Mugwagwa, V., et al. (2020). Public Institutions' Reforestation Programs in Zimbabwe: An Assessment.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-34] Mwitwa, J., et al. (2019). Community-led Reforestation in Zambia: Lessons and Challenges.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-35] Nachmias, C. (2015). Research Methods in the Social Sciences.Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-36] Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students.Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-37] Ng'onga, M., Kalaba, F.K., Mwitwa, J. and Bright, N., 2019. The interactive effects of rainfall, temperature and water level on fish yield in Lake Bangweulu fishery, Zambia. Journal of Thermal Biology. 84: 45-Google Scholar ↗

[refR-38] Ng'onga, M., Kalaba, F.K. and Mwitwa, J., 2019. The contribution of fisheries-based households to the local economy (Capital and Labour) and national fish yield: A case of Lake Bangweulu fishery, Zambia. Scientific African, 5, p.e00120.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-39] England, M. I., Dougill, A. J., Stringer, L. C., Vincent, K. E., Pardoe, J., Kalaba, F.K., Mkwambisi, D.D.,Namaganda, E., Afionis, S. (2018). Climate change adaptation and cross-sectoral policy coherence in Southern Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 1-13. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1283-0DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-40] Willemen, L., Crossman, N.D., Quatrini, S., Egoh, B., Kalaba. F.K., Mbilinyi, B., de Groot, R. (2018). Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for targeting land degradation neutrality investments in southeastern Africa, Journal of Arid Environments. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.05.009DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗