ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Law and Legislative Affairs
Open Access

Juridical Analysis Related To The Harmonization Of Lahat Regional Goverment Policy On Childfriendly District With Legal Protection Of Exploitation Of Child Workers In Lahat Palm Oil Industry In Terms Of Law Number 13 Of 2003 Concerning Manpower And Lahat District Regulation Number 2 Of 2020 Concerning Childfriendly Districts

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i06.lla01· Pages: 688-699· Vol. 13, No. 06, (2025)· Published: June 13, 2025
PDF
Views: 388 PDF downloads: 205

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the harmonization of the Lahat Regional Government's policy on Child Friendly District (KLA) with legal protection against child exploitation in the palm oil industry in Lahat Regency, as well as the extent to which the application of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Lahat Regency Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2020 concerning Child Friendly District can overcome the problem of child labor in the sector. The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory approach and analysis of relevant regulations and conceptual approaches. The results show that although there is a KLA policy in Lahat District that focuses on child protection, the implementation of protection against child labor in the palm oil industry still faces challenges, especially in terms of supervision and law enforcement. Harmonization between the Lahat District Regulation No. 2 of 2020 and the Manpower Law needs to be strengthened to ensure that local government policies not only support the Child Friendly District, but also provide maximum protection to children involved in risky work sectors, such as in the palm oil industry. This research suggests the need for better synergy between the local government, law enforcement agencies, as well as the private sector to address the issue of child exploitation and create a safe and decent working environment for children in Lahat District.

Keywords

Policy harmonizationChild Friendly Districtchild labor exploitationManpower LawLahat

References

  1. Adam, Muhhamad HR. (2017). Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal JISH, 3, 60.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Atem. (2017). Fenomena Pekerja Anak pada Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Wilayah Perbatasan Kabupaten Sambas, Kalimantan Barat. Raheema: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak, 2, 141.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Beniharmoni Harefa (2019). Kapita Selekta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak, Bandung: CV. Budi UtamaGoogle Scholar ↗
  4. Dr. Arafiq, F, S.E., M.M., Prof. Dr. MAwarni Sukmariningsih, R, dan Dr. Tumangkar, T, S.H., M.Hum. (2024). Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah untuk Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik, Semarang: CV. LawwanaGoogle Scholar ↗
  5. Dr. dr. Suminah, M.H. (2024). Urgensi Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Tenaga Kesehatan Akupuntur Terapis Sebagai Tenaga Kesehatan Tradisional Berdasarkan Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, Bandung: PT. AlumniGoogle Scholar ↗
  6. Drs. Suhasril, S. M. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan dan Anak. Depok: Rajawali Pers.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Dr. Suratman, S. M. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Depok: PT. Raja GrafindoPersada.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Ferdy Muzzamil, S. F. (n.d.). Pengaruh Lingkungan Terhadap Perkembangan Sosial Emosional Anak. Murangkalih : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 17.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Galuh Hanesty Gunawan, Z. P. (2021). Peran Save The Children Sebagai Lembaga Internasional Dalam Upaya Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak- Hak Dasar Anak. JKPS : Jurnal Kesejahteraan dan Pelayanan Sosial, 2, 114.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Hanafi. (2022). The Concept of Understanding Children in Positive Law and Customary Law. Voice Justitia Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 6, 26.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Hanum Cholida (2020). Hukum dan Hak Asasi Mnusia: Perkembangan dan Perdebatan Masa Kini, Salatiga: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) IAIN SalatigaGoogle Scholar ↗
  12. H. Zaeni Asyhadie, S. M. (2019). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Dalam teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Prenadamedia Group.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Lailatul Badriyah, N dan Ubaidillah. ((2024). Hadis Tarbawi Anti Kekerasan Pada Anak (Menelisik Model Pendidikan Prophetik Ta’dibulaulad Fil Ilahiyyah Perspektif Abdullah Nashih Ulwan dan Said Bin Ali Alqathani. Riau: Dotplus PublisherGoogle Scholar ↗
  14. Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta Edisi : 59, 6.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Monitor, P. (2024). Isu Eksploitasi dan Kepuasan Pekerja Perkebunan Sawit. Journal analysis of Palm Oil Strategic Issues Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, IV, 882 - 885.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Muchtolip. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Eksploitasi Anak di Kota Semarang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya, 3, 237.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Nadila Oktavianti, N. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Anak (Child Labor) di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI), 155-156Google Scholar ↗
  18. Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Lahat Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 tentang Kabupaten Layak AnakGoogle Scholar ↗
  19. Prof. Dr. Jimly Ashiddiqie, S. (2025, 1 16). Penegakan Hukum. Retrieved from https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/541934/mod_resource/content/1/Penegakan_Huku m.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  20. Prof. Dr. Santiago, F, S.H., M.M. dan Dr. Natsir Asnawi, R, S.H., M.H. (2024). PENGANTAR TEORI HUKUM Dasar- Dasar dan Perkembangan Teori Hukum dari Zaman Klasik hingga Post-Modern (Volume I). Jakarta: KencanaGoogle Scholar ↗
  21. Putri, A. M. (2023, 5 1). Dibalik Potensi Melimpah: Buruh Sawit Punya Masalah Serius. Retrieved 11 18, 2024, from CNBC Indonesia: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20230501155339-128-433464/dibalikpotensi-melimpah-bur uh-sawit-punya-masalahserius#:~:text=Angkanya%20turun%20sebesar%200%2C24,bagi%20masya rakat%20pedesaan%20utamanya%20buruhGoogle Scholar ↗
  22. Statistik, B. P. (2024, 5 6). Badan Pusat Statistik. Retrieved 1 16, 2025, from Presentase Anak Usia 10-17 Tahun yang Bekerja Menurut Provinsi (Persen) 2021-2023: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MjAwOCMy/persentase-anak-usia-10-17- tahun-yang-bekerja-menurut-provinsi.htmlGoogle Scholar ↗
  23. Sucahyo, N. (2021, 11 25). Pekerja Anak dan Perempuan: PR Besar Industri Sawit Indonesia. Retrieved 11 11, 2024, from VOA Indonesia: https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pekerjaanak-dan-perempuan-pr-besar-industri-sawit-indonesia-/632 7670.htmlGoogle Scholar ↗
  24. Wibisono, S. (2023, 6 26). Waspada Praktik Eksploitasi Anak di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit. Retrieved 11 6, 2024, from IDN Times Kaltim: https://kaltim.idntimes.com/news/kaltim/sri-wibisono/waspada-praktik-eksploitasi-anakdi-perkebunan- kelapa-sawitGoogle Scholar ↗
  25. Undang- Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003 tentang KetenagakerjaanGoogle Scholar ↗
  26. Undang- Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan AnakGoogle Scholar ↗
Author details
Valencia Grace Natanael
Maranatha Christian University, Faculty of Law and Digital Business, Bandung, West Java 40163
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Christin Septina Basani
Maranatha Christian University, Faculty of Law and Digital Business, Bandung, West Java 40163
👤 View Profile →