The Concept of Diplomatic Immunity under Conventional Law and Islamic Law: A Comparison
Downloads
This paper examines diplomatic immunity under both conventional law and Islamic law and identifies similarities and differences between the two systems. The paper is based on a qualitative methodology in which data is extracted from journals, books, websites, etc. In analyzing the data obtained from the sources, a content analysis was conducted. It is found that the principles of diplomatic immunity such as personal inviolability, immunity from the jurisdiction of domestic courts, freedom of religion, freedom of movement, protection of diplomatic baggage and couriers, freedom of communication, Inviolability of mission archives and inviolability of mission premises and private residence, as contained and codified in the VDR of 1961 and the VCCR of 1963, which today form the basis of international law, are very similar to the Islamic principle of diplomatic immunity, which has been firmly established since the seventh century. However, a key difference between these two systems is that immunity in Islamic law has largely emerged from the constitution of Islamic law and is consequently based on a distinct legal philosophy, whereas in conventional law it has essentially been developed out of political considerations and accepted by states as a binding rule for their international relations. In other words, it can be said that while both conventional and Islamic law recognize diplomatic immunity, there are crucial differences in its theoretical foundations and practical application. Conventional law, which is rooted in secular principles, focuses on international agreements such as the Vienna Conventions, while Islamic law, which is derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah, emphasizes divine revelation and the importance of respecting treaties and ensuring the safety of envoys.
Downloads
1. Abba, A. M. & Safiyanu, S. M. (2020). The Privileges and Immunities of Diplomatic Envoys Under International Law. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(19), p. 111-124., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3624195 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624195
2. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2001). The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam (Al-Halal Wal-Haram Fil Islam). Al- Falah Foundation, Cairo.
3. Aravamudan, Krishnan (2014). Pure Gems of Ramayanam. PartridgeIndia. pp. 773–774. ISBN 978-1-4828-3720-9.
4. Arjoun, S. I. (1981). Khalid Ibn al-Walid. Jeddah: Al-Dar Al-saudiah.
5. Bassiouni, M. C. (1980). Protection of Diplomats Under Islamic Law. American Journal of International Law, 74(3), 609-633. doi:10.2307/2201651
6. Churchman, David (2013). Why we fight: the origins, nature, and management of human conflict (2nd ed.). Lanham: University Press of America. p. 239. ISBN 9780761861386.
7. David, J.B (2001). International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Diplomatic and Consular Immunity: Guidance for Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities (2018). U.S. Department of State, Office of Foreign Missions.
9. Fadl, El; Abou, Khaled; Hopley, R. (2009). "Diplomatic Immunity". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World: Creeds-Intercession. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-530513-5.
10. Farhangi, L.S (1985-1986). Insuring against Abuse of Diplomatic Immunity. Stanford Law Review,38(6).
11. Gregory of Tours (1916). A History of the Franks. Pantianos Classics.
12. Groff, J.D (2000). A Proposal for Diplomatic Accountability Using the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: The Decline of an Absolute Sovereign Right. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 14
13. Guillaume, A. (1924). The Traditions of Islam: An Introduction to the Study of the Hadith Literature. Oxford: University
14. Herodotos. Histories. Book VII, Ch. 133-134. (pp. 558–559 in the cited version.) Transl. Rawlinson, G. Wordsworth. Ware, Herefordshire. 1996. ISBN 1-85326-466-0.
15. Ibn Ali, H. (2002). The Book of Government or Rules for Government (Darke H. Trans.). Persian Heritage Foundation, London. (Original work published 1960).
16. Iqbal, A. (1975). The Prophet's Diplomacy: The Art of Negotiation as Conceived and Developed by the Prophet of Islam. Claude Stark & Co., Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
17. Ismail, M. B. A. (2013). Justifications and Principles of Diplomatic Immunity: A Comparison between Islamic International Law and International Law. Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 9(1), pp. 60-101.
18. Ismail, M. B. A. (2016). Islamic law and transnational diplomatic law: a quest for complementarity in divergent legal theories. Springer.
19. Istanbuli, Y. (2001). Diplomacy and diplomatic practice in the early Islamic era. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
20. Kurizaki, S. A (2011). Natural History of Diplomacy; When Diplomacy Works. A&M University, Texas.
21. Lipman, J. N. (1998). Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. Washington: University of Washington Press.
22. Longley, R. (2019). "Is Diplomatic Immunity a 'License to Kill?'". ThoughtCo. Archived from the original on 14 October 2019. Retrieved 7 October 2019.
23. Malekian, F. (2011). Sources of Islamic International Law. In Principles of Islamic International Criminal Law: A Comparative Search (pp. 63-82). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Retrieved December 7, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctt1w8h3dt.9
24. McClanahan, G. V (1989). Diplomatic Immunity: Principles, Practices, Problems. Hurst, London.
25. Morris, W. G (2007). Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and Immunity. Hofstra Law Review, 36 (2). Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol36/iss2/19
26. Raza Rumi, (2011)"Raymond Davis and the Vienna Convention". Jinnah Institute. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 13 May 2025.
27. Re: Islamisation of Laws Public Notice No. 3 of 1983 PLD 1985 Federal Shariat Court, 344.
28. Ross, M. S (1989). Rethinking Diplomatic Immunity: A Review of Remedial Approaches to Address the Abuses of Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities. American University Journal of International Law & Policy,4(1), 173-205.
29. Safiyanu, Sadiq Muhammad (2021) “The Principle of Diplomatic Immunity Under Islamic Law.” International Journal of Social Sciences 5, Issue 21 (2021): 42-52. Accessed May 13, 2025, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3778001.
30. Subramanian, S. R. (2017). "Abuse of Diplomatic Privileges and the Balance between Immunities and the Duty to Respect the Local Laws and Regulations under the Vienna Conventions: The Recent Indian Experience". The Chinese Journal of Global Governance. 3 (2): 182–233. doi:10.1163/23525207-12340027. ISSN 2352-5193.
31. Tabari. (1989). The history of al-Ṭabarī (Taʼrīkh al-rusul wa'l mulūk). Albany: State University of New York.
32. Wilson, R (1984). Diplomatic Immunity from Criminal Jurisdiction: Essential to Effective International Relations. Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 7(1), 113-138. Available at https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol7/iss1/5.
33. Wright, S.L (1987). Diplomatic Immunity: A Proposal for Amending the Vienna Convention to Deter Violent Criminal Acts. Boston University International Law Journal, 5
34. Zawati, H.M. (2001). Is Jihad a Just War? War, Peace and Human Rights Under Islamic and Public International Law. Lewiston and New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.
35. Diplomatic Relations Act 1978
36. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961
37. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusuf Sani Abubakar, Mohamed Hamadikinane Maiga, Rajali Haji Aji, Mpawenimana Abdallah Saidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
