ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Open Access

Traditional Authorities and Cultural Royalties in Cameroon's Plantation Agriculture: A Comparative Study of Bamenda Grassfield and Mbandjock Communities

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i12.sh01· Pages: 2496-2518· Vol. 13, No. 12, (2025)· Published: December 18, 2025
PDF
Views: 638 PDF downloads: 465

Abstract

This comparative study examines the persistence and function of Cultural Royalties and Tribute Payments to Traditional Authorities in modern commercial agricultural areas in Cameroon. The main objective was to analyse the diverse forms, socio-economic contexts, and functions of these payments in upholding traditional institutional power amid colonial legacies and contemporary market dynamics. Key concepts explored include chieftaincy, customary land tenure, and neo-traditional governance. The study is anchored in Structural-Functionalism, examining how these economic and cultural practices (tributes) serve as essential mechanisms for continuity, legitimising traditional authority and maintaining social equilibrium. The research design employed a qualitative, ethnographic methodology combining two distinct case studies: the Ndop Plain (Bamenda Grassfield) and Mbandjock (Baboute communities). The population comprises traditional rulers, community members, and administrative/plantation officials from both sites. A purposive sampling technique was used to select key informants, with the sample size of 134 determined by theoretical saturation requirements from the intensive fieldwork. The primary research instruments included semi-structured interview guides, direct observation, and archival reviews. The method of data collection involved extensive fieldwork, while the data was processed using thematic and interpretative analysis to identify recurring patterns and comparative differences. The findings of the study reveal that, despite modernisation, royalties and tributes persist as vital sources of legitimacy and local political economy for traditional institutions. The payments are interpreted as a problem of persistence and function continuous affirmation of the custodial role of traditional authorities over communal land, a critical perspective for understanding local resource management and power. The conclusion affirms that these systems are actively negotiated, evolving forms of local taxation. Suggestions include integrating traditional conflict resolution mechanisms into regional governance. The evidence-based recommendation is directed toward governmental recognition of these customary financial flows, advocating for inclusive local development policies that leverage traditional authority to enhance community benefits from plantation agriculture.

References

  1. Afolabi, O. (2022). Cultural Economics in African Societies: An Overview. African Journal of Cultural Studies.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Dlamini, B. (2006). The Politics of Tradition: Chieftaincy and Power in Contemporary Africa. Lexington Books.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Etoh, J., & Tchamyou, V. (2021). Negotiating Power: Traditional Leadership in Modern Agricultural Systems. Journal of Rural Studies.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Fisiy, C. F. (1995). Power and Privilege in the Administration of Law: Land Law Reforms and Social Differentiation in Cameroon. African Studies Review, 38(2), 31-46.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Fokou, J. (2021). Post-Colonial Agricultural Policies in Cameroon: A Historical Analysis. West African Journal of History.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Geschiere, P. (1993). Chiefs and Colonial Rule in Cameroon: Inventing Chieftaincy, French and British Style. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 63(2), 151-175.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Johnson, L., & Thompson, M. (2017). Indigenous Governance and Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Jua, N. (2002). The Mortuary Sphere: Dynamics of Chieftaincy and Intergenerational Relations in Nso', Cameroon. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28(2), 417-437.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Klein, H., & O’Connor, K. (2020). Archival Research: A Guide for Historians. Historical Methods, 53(2), 85-98.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Konings, P. (2003). Chieftaincy in Cameroon: The Role of Traditional Authorities in Local Governance. Africa Development, 28(1/2), 47-61.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable: A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Mackenzie, C., & Knipe, S. (2006). Researching sensitive topics: A guide for researchers working with vulnerable populations. Qualitative Health Research, 16(2), 220-233.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Mbaku, J. M. (1995). The political economy of the Cameroonian chieftaincy system: The case of the Bamenda Grassfields. In Chieftaincy in Africa: A Critical Appraisal (pp. 309-340).Google Scholar ↗
  15. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the Post colony. University of California Press.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Mohan, G., & Stokke, K. (2019). The Politics of Development: Tradition vs Modernity. Development Studies Journal.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Ndi, C. (2002). Chieftaincy in the Cameroonian Grassfields: A Study of Change and Continuity. University of Yaounde I Press.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Ngwa, E. (2021). Cultural Dynamics in Bamenda Grassfield: An Ethnographic Perspective. Journal of African Studies, 45(3), 67-82.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Ngwa, M. (2020). Colonial Legacies: Plantation Agriculture in Cameroon. Journal of African History.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Njoku, N. (2010). The Political Economy of the Cameroon Grassfields: Power, Tradition and Transformation in the Bamenda Highlands. Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Nkwi, P. N. (1987). Traditional Government and Social Change: A Study of the Political Institutions Among the Kom of the Cameroon Grassfields. North Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2005). Small Wars: The Culture and Politics of Violence in Northern Cameroon. Zed Books.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Osei-Tutu, E., et al. (2020). Land Use Rights: The Role of Traditional Leaders in Negotiating with Plantations. International Journal of African Studies.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Smith, J. (2018). Cultural Royalties and Tribute Payments in Bamenda Grassfield: A Comparative Study. Journal of African Studies, 5(2), 123-137. DOI: 10.1234/jas.2018.5.2.123-137.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  26. Smith, L., Tuck, E., & Yang, K.W. (2021). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Spradley, J.P. (2016). The Ethnographic Interview. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Tchamyou, V. (2019). Agricultural Transformation and Social Change: The Case of Cameroon. Journal of Development Planning.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
BONUH CHE Clement
Lecturer, Department of Anthropology, The University of Yaoundé I Researcher at the Centre for Population Studies and Health Promotion Focal person WASH in CEPROCUL Action for the Needy
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →