ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Education And Language
Open Access

Effectiveness of Ethnomathematics-Based Project Learning in Rumah Bubungan Tinggi

, ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i12.el06· Pages: 4516-4525· Vol. 13, No. 12, (2025)· Published: December 21, 2025
PDF
Views: 570 PDF downloads: 193

Abstract

The aim of this research is to describe the effectiveness of project-based learning and discovery learning methods based on ethnomathematics at the Bubungan Tinggi house in terms of the ability to understand concepts, mathematical representation, and self-regulated learning. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a sample of two class VIII MTsN 2 Tanah Regency Seas for the 2022/2023 academic year selected using purposive sampling. The instruments used are concept understanding ability test questions, mathematical representation test questions, and self-regulated learning questionnaires. The validity of the pretest and posttest instruments carried out by two experts obtained valid and suitable results. The reliability of the instrument in the concept understanding ability test was 0.791, in the mathematical representation ability test it was 0.732, and in the self- regulated learning ability it was 0.909 in the very high category. The results of the research show that the project- based learning method based on ethnomathematics at the Bubungan Tinggi house is more effective than the discovery learning method based at the Bubungan Tinggi house in the ability to understand concepts.

Keywords

Bubungan Tinggi houseethnomathematicsconcept understandingdiscovery learningproject-based le

References

  1. Abidin, & Yunus. (2014). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. PT Refika Aditama.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Afrilianto, M., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Analisis kesulitan siswa smp dalam memahami konsep kubus balok. 1(4), 751–758.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2017). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif, progresif dan konteksual. Prenada Media.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Amalia, S. R. (2018). Efektivitas model discovery bermuatan etnomatematika terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 9–14.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Anintya, Y. A., Rochmad, R., & Mastur, Z. (2019). Representasi Matematis Bernuansa Etnomatematika dan Self Directed Learning. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 899–904. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/29302Google Scholar ↗
  6. Apriandinata, I. (2016). Penerapan metode discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan komunikasi matematik serta dampaknya terhadap kemadirian belajar siswa SMA. 147(March), 11–40.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Ardhyantama, V., Apriyanti, C., & Erviana, L. (2020). Project-based learning as the alternative for distance learning in pandemic COVID-19. Journal of Primary Education, 4(2), 141.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Aunurrahman. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran (hal. 177). Alfaabeta.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century : Skills for the future. 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Bicknell-Holmes, T., & Seth Hoffman, P. (2000). Elicit, engage, experience, explore: Discovery learning in library instruction. Reference Services Review, 28(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320010359632DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Cahdriyana, R. A., & Sujadi, Imam, R. (2014). Representasi matematis siswa kelas VII di SMP N 9 Yogyakarta dalam membangun konsep sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(6), 632–642.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 26). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The Effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709– 712. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.779DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Dewanto P, S. (2007). Meningkatkan kemampuan representasi multipel matematis mahasiswa melalui belajar berbasis-masalah.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Dewi, M. R. (2022). Kelebihan dan kekurangan project-based learning untuk penguatan profil pelajar pancasila kurikulum merdeka. Ejournal UPI, 19(2), 213–226.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Diyah Utami, M., Hanafi, I., & Nurhidayat, D. (2019). Perbandingan model pembelajaran project based learning dengan model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran sistem komputer kelas X Multimedia SMK Negeri 7 Jakarta. PINTER : Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer, 3(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.21009/pinter.3.1.5DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Edelsbrunner, H. (2014). Three dimensions. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology (Nomor 9783319059563). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05957-0_4DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  19. Fajriah, N., Pasani, C. F., Suryaningsih, Y., Eryanto, A. N. E., & Nasrullah, N. (2023). Pendampingan pembuatan bahan ajar berbasis etnomatematika lingkungan lahan basah untuk meningkatkan wawasan kearifan lokal guru matematika. Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(1), 313. https://doi.org/10.20527/btjpm.v5i1.6847DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Fajriah, N., Sumartono, & Suryaningsih, Y. (2020). Etnomatematika budaya Banjar di daerah sungai kota Banjarmasin untuk literasi pembelajaran matematika sekolah menengah.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Fauzi, I., & Arisetyawan, A. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada ateri geometri di sekolah dasar. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif -Inovatif, 11(1), 27–35.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Fonna, M., & Mursalin. (2018). Literature study: Role of self-efficacy toward student’s in achievement in mathematical multiple representation ability (MMRA). Peuradeun, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.174DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  23. Fujiarti, A., & Prabawanto, S. (2021). The effect of project-based learning withGoogle Scholar ↗
  24. realistic mathematics approach on students self-regulated learning. The 3rd International Conference on Elementary Education, 3(1), 392–397.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Habibi, & Suparman. (2020). Literasi matematika dalam menyambut PISA 2021 berdasarkan kecakapan abad 21 [Mathematical literacy in welcoming PISA 2021 based on 21st century skills]. JKPM: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 57–64. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/jkpm/article/view/8177Google Scholar ↗
  26. Hasanah, U., Damayani, A. T., & Reffiane, F. (2020). Keefektifan model discovery learning berbasis ethnomathematics materi bangun datar terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik kelas IV SDN Pasucen 02. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran ke-SD-an, 1(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v1i1.1074DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  27. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. . (1992). Learning and Teaching With Understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), A Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Macmillan Library Reference Simon &Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Hijriani, L., Rahardjo, S., & Rahardi, R. (2018). Deskripsi representasi matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA. c, 603–607.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Hwang, W., & Chen, N. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system multiple. April 2017.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Indah Fajrotuz Zahro, I. F. Z., Rizky Amalia, R. A., & Sugito, S. (2021). Deskripsi kemandirian siswa dalam pembelajaran daring pada masa pandemi covid. Attanwir : Jurnal Keislaman dan Pendidikan, 12(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.53915/jurnalkeislamandanpendidikan.v12i1.50DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  31. Isjoni. (2010). Pembelajaran kooperatif. meningkatkan kecerdasan antar peserta didik. Pustaka Pelajar.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Johar, R., & Subianto, M. (2013). Pengembangan soal matematika setara PISA pada konten shape and space dan change and relationship untuk siswa SMP. 29–39.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (sixth edition). Pearson Education.Google Scholar ↗
  34. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research : Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (P. L. Fleming (ed.); 5 ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar ↗
  35. Jones, A. . (2000). The fifth process standard: An argument to include representation in standard.Google Scholar ↗
  36. Juliani, S., Murni, A., & Maimunah, M. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Menggunakan Discovery learning Untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 3119. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5545DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  37. Kabu, T. E., Taneo, P. N. ., & Abi, A. M. (2021). Pengembangan sumber belajar berbasis etnomatematika dengan model PjBL pada materi bangun ruang prisma. RANGE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 84–88.Google Scholar ↗
  38. Kartini. (2009). Peranan representasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. 978– 979.Google Scholar ↗
  39. Kemdikbud. (2018). Permendikbud Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. JDIH Kemendikbud, 2025, 1– 527.Google Scholar ↗
  40. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan penilaian oleh pendidik dan satuan pendidikan sekolah menengah pertama. Kementerian Pendidikan dan KebudayaanGoogle Scholar ↗
  41. Menengah, 43–45. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/18051/1/1. Panduan Penilaian SMP - Cetakan Keempat 2017.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  42. Khanah, N., Rasiman, R., & Sutrisno, S. (2019). Efektivitas model project based learning (PjBL) dan model discovery leaning (DL) berbantuan macromedia flash terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4, 135–145. https://103.98.176.39/index.php/senatik/article/view/51Google Scholar ↗
  43. Lambertus. (2016). Developing skills understanding of mathematical. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(7), 315–326.Google Scholar ↗
  44. Linda. (2015). Penerapan pembelajaran Project-based learning (Pjbl) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa SMA. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 5 No 2. https://doi.org/10.23969/pjme.v5i2.2527DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  45. Mahendra, I. W. E. (2017). Project based learning bermuatan etnomatematika dalam pembelajaran matematika. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9257DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  46. Mariyaningsih, Nining, & Hidayati, M. (2018). Bukan kelas biasa: teori dan praktik berbagai model dan metode pembelajaran menerapkan inovasi pembelajaran di Kelas-kelas inspiratif. CV Kekata Group.Google Scholar ↗
  47. Marsigit, Condromukti, R., Setiana, D. S., & Hardiarti, S. (2014). Pengembangan pembelajaran matematika berbasis etnomatematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Etnomatnesia, 20–38.Google Scholar ↗
  48. Mary, & Anastasia. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problembased Learning, 7(2), 127–150. http://10.0.30.91/15415015.1339%5Cnhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db= eue&AN=90663292&amp%5Cnlang=ko&site=ehost-liveGoogle Scholar ↗
  49. Maubana, W. M., & Sakbana, R. S. (2021). Pengaruh model discovery learning dan PjBL terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Diffraction, 2(2), 80– 85. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v2i2.2432DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  50. Maya, N. (2016). Model pembelajaran project based learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah. 6(2), 149–160.Google Scholar ↗
  51. Mihić, M., & Završki, I. (2017). Professors’ and students’ perception of the advantages and disadvantages of project based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(6), 1737–1750.Google Scholar ↗
  52. Mudzakkir, H. S. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran „think-talk-write” untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematik beragam mahasiswa SMP. UPI Bandung.Google Scholar ↗
  53. Muhamad, N. (2015). Pengaruh Metode Discovery learning Untuk Meningkatkan Representasi Matematis Dan Percaya Diri Siswa. 75–90.Google Scholar ↗
  54. Mulyasa, E. (2010). Penelitian tindakan sekolah. Remaja Rosda Karya.Google Scholar ↗
  55. Mulyati, T. (2016). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa sekolah dasar (Mathematical problem solving sbility of elementary school students). EDUHUMANIORA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 1–20.Google Scholar ↗
  56. Nurfitriyanti, M. (2016). Model pembelajaran project based learning terhadap kemamppuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Formatif, 6(2), 149–160.Google Scholar ↗
  57. Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Buku ajar dasardasar statistik penelitian.Google Scholar ↗
  58. OECD. (2018). Programme for internasional student assesment (PISA) resulat from PISA 2018. 1–10.Google Scholar ↗
  59. Pemerintah Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 57 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Nasional endidikan. Standar Nasional Pendidikan, 102501, 1–49.Google Scholar ↗
  60. Pemerintah, P., Indonesia, R., Atas, P., Rahmat, D., Yang, T., Esa, M., & Indonesia, P. R. (2013). PP RI 32 2013 tentang standar nasional pendidikan.Google Scholar ↗
  61. Permendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 22. Tahun 2016. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.Google Scholar ↗
  62. Pratama, F. W. (2017). Peran self-regulated learning dalam memoderatori pembelajaran dengan pendekatan saintifik terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Satya Widya, 33(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2017.v33.i2.p99-108DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  63. Putra, T., Sasongko, M., Oktavianingtyas, E., Matematika, P., Mipa, P., & Jember, U. (2016). Mengetahui level literasi matematika siswa SMP (The development of package model of PISA content space and shape in purpose to know the mathematics literacy level of junior high school students ). Jurnal Edukasi, III(1), 27–32.Google Scholar ↗
  64. Ratnasari, N., Tadjudin, N., Syazali, M., Mujib, M., & Andriani, S. (2018). Project based learning (PjBL) model on the mathematical representation ability. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2535DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  65. Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (Panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). In Parama Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
  66. Rizkia, M., Subhananto, & Rahmatullah. (2021). Efektivitas model discovery learning berbantuan puzzle lingkaran terhadap pemahaamn konsep pecahan senilai siswa kelas IV SDN 54 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2(1).Google Scholar ↗
  67. Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology. In D. Groundwater (Ed.), McGraw-Hill (5 ed.). Micheal Sugarman.Google Scholar ↗
  68. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  69. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning:From teaching to self-reflective practice. In Guilford Publications.Google Scholar ↗
  70. Serin, H. (2019). Project based learning in mathematics context. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p232DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  71. Shapiro, A. S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). Biometrika trust an analysis of variance test for normality (Complete samples ). Biometrika, 52(3), 591–611. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1f1d/9a7151d52c2e26d35690dbc7ae8098 beee22.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  72. Shirley, L. (2001). Ethnomathematics as a fundamental of instructional methodology. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(3), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655699DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  73. Singgih, B. (2015). Strategi pembelajaran. LaksBang PRESSindo.Google Scholar ↗
  74. Sudianto, Dwijanto, & Dewi, N. R. (2019). Students’ creative thinking abilities and self regulated learning on project-based learning with LMS Moodle. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 10–17. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmerGoogle Scholar ↗
  75. Suraji, Maimunah, & Saragih, S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (SPLDV). Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i2.3897DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  76. Suryani, S. (2021). Keefektifan discovery learning berbantuan alat peraga kubus satuan terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Joyful Learning Journal, 10(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jlj.v10i1.40076DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  77. Susilowaty, N. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Project based learning terhadap peningkatan kemampuan self-regulated learning mahasiswa Universitas Advent Indonesia. Jurnal Padegogik, 3(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i1.2235DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  78. Tampubolon, J., Atiqah, N., & Panjaitan, U. I. (2019). Kehidupan Sehari-Hari Dalam Masyarakat.Google Scholar ↗
  79. Tampubolon, M. R., & Nurdalilah. (2021). Pemahaman konsep geometri dengan model project based learning berbasis etnomatemaika pada bentuk kue tradisional khas Sumatera Utara. 8(2), 272–282.Google Scholar ↗
  80. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review research on project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 22(1), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-00451%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.015%0Ahttps://doi.org/10. 1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001%0Ahttp://pitt.summon.serialssolutions.com/li nk/0/eLvHCXMwVV27CsJAEDwQQQRLvdYPMHJ32SSXUtSQQrsUae _2YWfl_-PGB2g51RY7zA7sDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  81. W.Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar ↗
  82. Weinstein, C. ., Palmer, D., & Schulte, A. . (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI). FL: H & H Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
  83. Widakdo, W. A. (2017). Mathematical representation ability by using project based learning on the topic of statistics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012055DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  84. Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.Google Scholar ↗
  85. Yulia. (2019). Analisis pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep segi empat (studi kasus pada siswa kelas VII SMP negri 1 Sindue). EQUALS Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 24.Google Scholar ↗
  86. Yustinaningrum, B. (2019). Model pembelajaran matematika abad 21 (kajian model project based learning). Jurnal Sinektik, 2(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.33061/js.v2i1.3019DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  87. Yusuf, A. R., Student, P. G., Engineering, F., & Malang, U. N. (2021). Implementation of Online STEM-PjBL through Various Learning Platforms in Vocational High Schools during Covid-19 Pandemic. İlköğretim Online, 20(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.04DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  88. Zhang, W., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Ethnomathematics and Its Integration within the Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 151–157.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Rahmawati Rahmawati
Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Marsigit Marsigit
Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
Ach Fatori
3Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia
👤 View Profile →