ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Chemical Engineering
Open Access

Water effect on the morphology and magnetic properties of poly(3-hexylthiophene)

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v9i07.ce01· Pages: 16-22· Vol. 9, No. 07, (2021)· Published: July 26, 2021
PDF
Views: 345 PDF downloads: 151

Abstract

Poly(3-hexylthiophene) magnetics characteristics and morphologic prepared in acetonitrile solution by electrochemical techniques have been studied, and the results are reported. The results indicate that the films prepared in small amounts of water in the electrolyte solution show significantly different morphology and magnetic behavior. The differences in these properties are explained in terms of different functional groups introduced during polymers film preparation.

Keywords

Poly(3-hexylthiophene)polymers magneticπ-conjugated systemorganic ferromagnetism

References

  1. Chiang, C.K., et al., Physical Review Letters, 1977. 39(17): p. 1098-1101.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Horowitz, G., et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 1990. 67(1): p. 528-532.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Geiger, F., et al.. Advanced Materials, 1993. 5(12): p. 922-925.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Brabec, C.J., N.S. Sariciftci, and J.C. Hummelen, Plastic solar cells. Advanced Functional Materials, 2001. 11(1): p. 15-26.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Bertho, D. and C. Jouanin. Physical Review B, 1987. 35(2): p. 626-633.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Diaz, A.F., Chem. Scr., 1981. 17: p. 142.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Diaz, A.F., K.K. Kanazawa, and G.P. Gardini. Journal of the Chemical Society-Chemical Communications, 1979(14): p. 635-636.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Kanazawa, K.K., et al. Synthetic Metals, 1980. 1(3): p. 329-336.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Heinze, J., K. Hinkelmann, and M. Land, DECHEMA Monogr., 1988. 112: p. 75.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Bech, F., M. Oberst, and R. Jansen, Electrochim. Acta, 1990. 35: p. 1841.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Heinze, J., Top. Curr. Chem., 1990. 152: p. 1.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Downard, A.J. and D. Pletcher. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1986. 206(1-2): p. 139-145.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Delabouglise, D., et al.New Journal of Chemistry, 1988. 12(2-3): p. 155-161.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Hillman, A.R. and E.F. Mallen. J. Electroanl. Chem., 1988. 243: p. 403.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Barsch, U. and F. Beck. Electrochimica Acta, 1996. 41: p. 1761.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Skompska, M., et al. Langmuir, 2003. 19: p. 2318.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Genies, E.M., G. Bidan, and A.F. Diaz. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1983. 149(1-2): p. 101-113.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Lemon, P. and J. Haigh. Materials Research Bulletin, 1999. 34(5): p. 665-672.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Lafolet, F., et al.. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005. 109(26): p. 12755-12761.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Fernando de Paula
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Ilha Solteira
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →