Implementation of Decision Making in the Public Sector in Indonesia

M. Fachri Adnan; Nika Saputra; Syamsir Syamsir; Rizki Afri Mulia

doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v10i2.ps01

Abstract

In the organization, decision-making is based on the authority governed by the organization's needs. Inaccuracies in decision-making regarding the forum, process, approach, and the decision results will reduce the power of cohesion between organization members in supporting the decision. This study aims to identify, review, evaluate, and interpret research related to the decision-making process in organizations. With the Systematic Literature Review approach pattern in journals that have been published from 2016 to 2021, the results show that current decision-making implementation research focuses on two topics and trends: supervision and the role of leaders. The method that is often used in research on the implementation of decision-making is a quantitative approach of 75% and a qualitative approach of 25%. The cause of the low performance of decision-making in the public sector is a leader who allows himself to be overwhelmed by doubts controlling his way of thinking and acting.

Keywords: Systematic Literature Review, Implementation, Decision Making.

Keywords

Systematic Literature ReviewImplementationDecision Making

References

N. L. Suryani, D. Karlina, and S. Cay, “Pengantar Manajemen,” 2020.Google Scholar ↗
H. N. S. Tangkilisan, Manajemen publik. Grasindo, 2005.Google Scholar ↗
M. F. Adnan, J. Dalle, H. Malau, and V. Ivanka, "The Influence of Social-Media and Public Policy on Public Political Participation in Handling COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study from Indonesian Domestic and Overseas Youngsters Perspective," Croat. Int. Relations Rev., vol. 27, no. 87, pp. 133–156, 2021.Google Scholar ↗
R. A. Mulia and N. Saputra, "Systematic Literature Review: Determination of Government Policy in Health and Education Development for Improved Human Capital," J. EL-RIYASAH, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 92–107, 2021.Google Scholar ↗
S. M. Dagun, “Kamus Besar.” Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jakarta: Edisi II, 2006.Google Scholar ↗
J. Reason, "Human error: models and management," Bmj, vol. 320, no. 7237, pp. 768–770, 2000.Google Scholar ↗
I. Syamsi, “Pengambilan keputusan dan sistem informasi,” 2021.Google Scholar ↗
M. S. Suharnan, “Psikologi kognitif,” Surabaya: Srikandi, 2005.Google Scholar ↗
J. Rakhmat, “Psikologi komunikasi,” 2011.Google Scholar ↗
M. I. Hasan, “Pokok-pokok materi teori pengambilan keputusan,” 2004.Google Scholar ↗
B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, "Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering," 2007.Google Scholar ↗
M. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, A. K. M. M. Islam, C. K. Cheng, R. B. Permadi, and R. Feldt, "Evaluation and measurement of software process improvement—a systematic literature review," IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 398–424, 2011.Google Scholar ↗
D. Radjenović, M. Heričko, R. Torkar, and A. Živkovič, “Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1397–1418, 2013.Google Scholar ↗
R. S. Wahono, "A systematic literature review of software defect prediction," J. Softw. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2015.Google Scholar ↗
R. Larasati, M. Asnawi, and ..., “Analisis Penerapan Good University Governance Pada Perguruan Tinggi Di Kota Jayapura,” J. Appl. …, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.polibatam.ac.id/index.php/JAMA/article/view/951.Google Scholar ↗
R. C. R. Kusmayadi, “Proses pengambilan keputusan dalam keluarga (Studi mengenai pekerja wanita dalam industri pengolahan tembakau Pr. Tali Jagaddi desa Gondowangi kecamatan Wagir kabupaten Malang),” Gend. Equal. Int. J. Child Gend. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017.Google Scholar ↗
E. Mulyani, F. Fifrman, G. Thabrani, and M. R. Linda, “PKM Pelatihan Analisis Fundamental dan Teknikal Sebagai Alat Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi di Pasar Modal Pada Guru MGMP Akuntansi dan Ekonomi SMA/SMK Kota Bukittinggi,” Wahana Ris. Akunt., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 1567, 2019, doi: 10.24036/wra.v7i2.106949.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
R. A. Mulia, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Pasaman Barat),” J. EL-RIYASAH, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 7, 2019, doi: 10.24014/jel.v9i1.6798.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
N. Dewi and K. T. Dwiyanti, “Faktor dalam pengambilan keputusan etis oleh konsultan pajak: Individual dan situasional,” J. Ilm. Akunt. dan …, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/2096.Google Scholar ↗
A. Salam and S. Sutaryo, “Kesesuaian Sistem Pelaporan Keuangan Akrual dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Internal di Pemerintah Daerah,” Assets J. Akunt. dan Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 21, 2019, doi: 10.25273/jap.v8i1.4087.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
P. I. Christianto, K. Ashar, and A. Manzilati, “KEGUNAAN INFORMASI AKUNTANSI DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN INTERNAL OLEH UNIT AKUNTANSI KUASA PENGGUNA ANGGARAN(UAKPA),” J. Perbendaharaan, Keuang. Negara dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 81–99, 2017.Google Scholar ↗
N. Istiqomah, “Analisis Implementasi Government Finance Statistics di Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori Institusional,” Indones. Treas. Rev. J. Perbendaharaan Keuang. Negara dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 69–90, 2018, doi: 10.33105/itrev.v3i2.66.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
M. Ahyaruddin and R. Akbar, “Akuntabilitas dan kinerja instansi pemerintah: semu atau nyata?,” J. Akunt. Audit. Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 105–117, 2017, doi: 10.20885/jaai.vol21.iss2.art3.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-1] N. L. Suryani, D. Karlina, and S. Cay, “Pengantar Manajemen,” 2020.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] H. N. S. Tangkilisan, Manajemen publik. Grasindo, 2005.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] M. F. Adnan, J. Dalle, H. Malau, and V. Ivanka, "The Influence of Social-Media and Public Policy on Public Political Participation in Handling COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study from Indonesian Domestic and Overseas Youngsters Perspective," Croat. Int. Relations Rev., vol. 27, no. 87, pp. 133–156, 2021.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] R. A. Mulia and N. Saputra, "Systematic Literature Review: Determination of Government Policy in Health and Education Development for Improved Human Capital," J. EL-RIYASAH, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 92–107, 2021.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] S. M. Dagun, “Kamus Besar.” Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jakarta: Edisi II, 2006.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] J. Reason, "Human error: models and management," Bmj, vol. 320, no. 7237, pp. 768–770, 2000.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] I. Syamsi, “Pengambilan keputusan dan sistem informasi,” 2021.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] M. S. Suharnan, “Psikologi kognitif,” Surabaya: Srikandi, 2005.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] J. Rakhmat, “Psikologi komunikasi,” 2011.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] M. I. Hasan, “Pokok-pokok materi teori pengambilan keputusan,” 2004.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, "Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering," 2007.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] M. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, A. K. M. M. Islam, C. K. Cheng, R. B. Permadi, and R. Feldt, "Evaluation and measurement of software process improvement—a systematic literature review," IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 398–424, 2011.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] D. Radjenović, M. Heričko, R. Torkar, and A. Živkovič, “Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1397–1418, 2013.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] R. S. Wahono, "A systematic literature review of software defect prediction," J. Softw. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2015.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-15] R. Larasati, M. Asnawi, and ..., “Analisis Penerapan Good University Governance Pada Perguruan Tinggi Di Kota Jayapura,” J. Appl. …, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.polibatam.ac.id/index.php/JAMA/article/view/951.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-16] R. C. R. Kusmayadi, “Proses pengambilan keputusan dalam keluarga (Studi mengenai pekerja wanita dalam industri pengolahan tembakau Pr. Tali Jagaddi desa Gondowangi kecamatan Wagir kabupaten Malang),” Gend. Equal. Int. J. Child Gend. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-17] E. Mulyani, F. Fifrman, G. Thabrani, and M. R. Linda, “PKM Pelatihan Analisis Fundamental dan Teknikal Sebagai Alat Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi di Pasar Modal Pada Guru MGMP Akuntansi dan Ekonomi SMA/SMK Kota Bukittinggi,” Wahana Ris. Akunt., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 1567, 2019, doi: 10.24036/wra.v7i2.106949.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-18] R. A. Mulia, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Pasaman Barat),” J. EL-RIYASAH, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 7, 2019, doi: 10.24014/jel.v9i1.6798.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-19] N. Dewi and K. T. Dwiyanti, “Faktor dalam pengambilan keputusan etis oleh konsultan pajak: Individual dan situasional,” J. Ilm. Akunt. dan …, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/2096.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-20] A. Salam and S. Sutaryo, “Kesesuaian Sistem Pelaporan Keuangan Akrual dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Internal di Pemerintah Daerah,” Assets J. Akunt. dan Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 21, 2019, doi: 10.25273/jap.v8i1.4087.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-21] P. I. Christianto, K. Ashar, and A. Manzilati, “KEGUNAAN INFORMASI AKUNTANSI DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN INTERNAL OLEH UNIT AKUNTANSI KUASA PENGGUNA ANGGARAN(UAKPA),” J. Perbendaharaan, Keuang. Negara dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 81–99, 2017.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-22] N. Istiqomah, “Analisis Implementasi Government Finance Statistics di Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori Institusional,” Indones. Treas. Rev. J. Perbendaharaan Keuang. Negara dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 69–90, 2018, doi: 10.33105/itrev.v3i2.66.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-23] M. Ahyaruddin and R. Akbar, “Akuntabilitas dan kinerja instansi pemerintah: semu atau nyata?,” J. Akunt. Audit. Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 105–117, 2017, doi: 10.20885/jaai.vol21.iss2.art3.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗