Abstract
The purpose of this study consists of two main discussions namely how the perception of lecturers on optimizing the implementation of MBKM and how the perception of lecturers on the mechanism for granting the equivalent of MBKM in study program curriculum. The research design was carried out using data from SPADA DIKTI and 309 lecturers from University of Islam Malang as a respondent of this study and analyzed using SPSS 16 version. Descriptive quantitative was used as a research method to deeply describe about data. The result showed that lecturers have positive perception about the implementation of MBKM at University of Islam Malang regarding with the existence of similar program of MBKM, published MBKM curriculum and the involvement of lecturers in preparing the implementation of MBKM. Further, the majority lecturers already know the mechanism of how to equivalent the credits of MBKM program towards their study programs curriculum by choosing structured forms.
Keywords
References
- Barnett, R. (2006). Graduate Attributes in an age of uncertainty. In S. Holland & P. Hager, Graduate attributes, learning and employability (pp. 49–65). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar ↗
- Casner-Lotto, J. and Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century US workforce. Washington, DC.Google Scholar ↗
- Chatturgoon, S. (2008). An Exploration into Teachers’ Perception on Teacher Leadership and their Motivational Levels to Engage in Leadership Roles at School. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar ↗
- Cheung, A.C.K., Wong, P.M. (2012). Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum reform in Hong Kong:Key findings from a large-scale survey study. International journal of Educational Management 26(1):39-54.Google Scholar ↗
- Clifford, V. & Montgomery, C. (2014a). Challenging conceptions of western higher education and promoting graduates as global citizens. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(1), 28–45.Google Scholar ↗
- Fuadi, T. M. & Aswita, D. (2021). Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM): Bagaimana Penerapan dan Kedala yang Dihadapi oleh Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Aceh. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, Vo. 5, No. 2, Juli 2021: 603-614Google Scholar ↗
- Haigh, M. (2008). Internationalisation, planetary citizenship and Higher Education Inc. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 38(4), 427–449.Google Scholar ↗
- Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Strategi Implementasi BKP Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi.Google Scholar ↗
- Kodrat, D. (2021). Industrial Mindset of Education in Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Policy. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam. 4(1), 9-14Google Scholar ↗
- Krishnapatria, K. (2021). Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) curriculum in English studies program: Challenges and opportunities. ELT in Focus, 4(1), 12-19, Doi: 10.35706/eltinfc.v4i1.5276DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Mkpa MA (1987). Curriculum development. Owerri: Totan Publishing Limited.Google Scholar ↗
- Molapo MR, Pillay V (2018). Politicising curriculum implementation: The case of primary schools. South African Journal of Education 38(1):1-9.Google Scholar ↗
- Nehe, B., M., (2021). Analisis Konsep Implementasi Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka dalam Mengahadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 di Masa Pendemik di STKIP Setia Budhi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional SETIABUDHI. Vol.1 No. 1, Mei 2021Google Scholar ↗
- Purwanti, E. (2020). Preparing the Implementation of Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka Policy in Higher Education Institutions. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020.Google Scholar ↗