ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Political Science
Open Access

Constraints in Implementing Decentralisation in Zambia

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v10i6.ps01· Pages: 32-43· Vol. 10, No. 06, (2022)· Published: June 18, 2022
PDF
Views: 588 PDF downloads: 265

Abstract

Purpose: Against a backdrop of Zambia’s continued weak economic conditions and with many local authorities, experiencing declining local revenues and financial performance, this paper presents a synthesis of the local government turnaround findings. It aims to identify the constraints to decentralization and recovery strategies based on the evidence provided by pragmatic research.

Design/methodology/approach: The questionnaire survey was carried out over a period of two weeks from sixth to 20 May 2019. 120 questionnaires were distributed via online to all 120 respondents using purposive and critical case sampling. The questionnaire was created and deployed using free online software (kobotoolbox) to the 120 critical case and purposively selected respondents. Out of 120 respondents 103 responded creating a survey response rate of above 85%.

Findings: The research found that the major constraints in implementing decentralisation included; Continued delay to release decentralised functions by central government; lack of political will from central government; failure to implement the agreed decentralised structure by central government; failure to relinquish some revenue streams to local authorities; governments unclear policy guidance on decentralization; lack of a standardised system as well as a monitoring mechanism; and failure to generate adequate own revenue by local authorities.

Research implications: This research assumes a significant role in formulation of policy for local government tier and could provide a basis for further research in this area as well as designing policies for an improved local government fiscal system.

Practical implications: this study adds pragmatic perspectives towards resolving revenue problems faced by Zambia’s local authorities.

Originality/value: This paper compiles facts and offers practitioners an evidence-based view through investigating Zambia’s local government economic structure, analyzing forces underlying them and examining their consequential cultural interplay.

Keywords: Decentralisation; Local Authority; Local Revenue

Keywords

DecentralizationLocal AuthorityLocal Revenue

References

  1. Ahmad, & Abu Talib, N. (2011). Decentralization and Participatory Rural Development: A Literature Review. Contemporary Economics. Vol. 5 Issue 4, pp.58-67Google Scholar ↗
  2. Amusa, H. and Mabugu, R. (2016). The Contribution of Fiscal Decentralization to Regional Inequality: Empirical Results for South African Municipalities. Economic Research Southern Africa. ERSA working paper 597, pp1-41Google Scholar ↗
  3. Arvate, P. R. (2013). Electoral Competition and Local Government Responsiveness in Brazil. World Development Vol. 43, pp. 67–83Google Scholar ↗
  4. Ashraf, N., Bandiera, O. and Blum, F. (2016). Decentralisation in Zambia: A comparative analysis of strategies and barriers to implementation. International Growth Centre Final Report. S-41306-ZMB-1. https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Ashraf-et-al-2016-Final-report.pdf. Accessed on 1st February, 2020Google Scholar ↗
  5. Cammack, D. and Kanyongolo, E. (2011). Local Governance and Public Goods in Malawi. IDS Bulletin. 42. 43 - 52. 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00210.x.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Cheka, C. (2007). The State of the Process of Decentralisation in Cameroon. Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa. Africa Development, Vol. XXXII, No. 2, pp. 181–196Google Scholar ↗
  7. Chemouni, B. (2014). Explaining the design of the Rwandan decentralization: elite vulnerability and the territorial repartition of power, Journal of Eastern African Studies, 8:2, 246-262Google Scholar ↗
  8. Cox, E. (2010). Five Foundations of Real Localism. Institute for Public Policy Research. Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar ↗
  9. Curristine, T., Lonti, Z. and Joumard, I. (2007). Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities. OECD Journal on Budgeting. ISSN 1608-7143. Volume 7 – No. 1Google Scholar ↗
  10. Diep, L., Archer, D. and Gueye, C. (2016). Decentralisation in West Africa: the implications for urban climate change governance; the cases of Saint-Louis (Senegal) and Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). IIED Working Paper. IIED, London, pp.1-60Google Scholar ↗
  11. Fatile, J. O. and Ejalonibu, G. L. (2015). Decentralization and Local Government Autonomy: Quest for Quality Service Delivery in Nigeria. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade 10(2): 1-21, Article no.BJEMT.19478Google Scholar ↗
  12. Green, E. (2008). District Creation and Decentralisation in Uganda. Crisis States Research Centre. Crisis States Working Papers Series No.2. Working Paper No. 24Google Scholar ↗
  13. Hammond, G. W. and Tosun, S. M. (2009). The Impact of Local Decentralization on Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. Counties. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4574Google Scholar ↗
  14. Husain, I. (2012). Adapting Public Sector Services to Local Delivery. The Lahore Journal of Economics. 17: SE pp. 359–385Google Scholar ↗
  15. Jong, K. de, Loquai, C. and Soiri, I. (1999). Decentralisation and poverty reduction: exploring the Linkages. IDS Policy Papers, 1/99. Helsinki: Institute of Development Studies / Maastricht: ECDPMGoogle Scholar ↗
  16. Lliffe, M., Houghton, R., Morley, J. and Sollazzo, G. (2014). Improving Public Service Provision in the Developing World Through a Crowd-sourced Location Based Reporting Application. University of Nottingham (UK); 2: St. George’s University of London (UK).psxmi@nottingham.ac.uk. OSGEO Journal Volume 13Google Scholar ↗
  17. Mafema, E. D., Kealeboga, J. M. and Tshishonga, N. (2014). Analyzing the Quality of South Africa's Public Services at the Local Government Level through the Batho Pele Principles. The Journal of African & Asian Local Government Studies. Vol. 3 Issue 1, p105Google Scholar ↗
  18. Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). The impact of fiscal decentralization: Issues in theory and challenges in practice. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Maschietto, H. R. (2016). Decentralisation and local governance in Mozambique: the challenges of promoting bottom-up dynamics from the top down. Conflict, Security & Development. VOL. 16, NO. 2, pp. 103–123Google Scholar ↗
  20. Muriu, R. A. (2013). Decentralization, citizen participation and local public service delivery: A study on the nature and influence of citizen participation on decentralized service delivery in Kenya, Schriftenreihe für Public und Nonprofit Management, No. 17, Universitätsverlag Potsdam, Potsdam, p. 1-97. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65085Google Scholar ↗
  21. Mushemeza, E., D. (2019). Decentralisation in Uganda: Trends, Achievements, Challenges and Proposals for Consolidation, Kampala: ACODE Policy Research Paper Series No.93, pp.1-95Google Scholar ↗
  22. Mutebi, A. M. 2005. "Government and Citizen Engagement at the Local Level in Thailand: Nan Municipality's "Roundtables" and "Expert Panels.” Asia Pacific: Perspectives V, Special Issue: Redemocratizing Southeast Asia through Citizen, Corporation, and Government Alliances (August): 16-28.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Mohammed, A. (2016). Decentralization and Participation: Theory and Ghana's Evidence. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17(2), pp. 232-255.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Mohammed, J. North, N., and Ashton, T. (2016). Decentralisation of health services in Fiji: a decision space analysis. International Journal of Health Policy Management. Vol 5(3), pp.173–181.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Nzimakwe, T. P. and Pillay, P. (2014). Enhancing service delivery through decentralization: A South African experience. African Journal of Public Affairs. Volume 7 number 1Google Scholar ↗
  26. Olum, Y. (2014). Decentralisation in developing countries: preconditions for successful implementation. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance (CJLG). Issue 15, 0, 4061, pp.23-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i0.4061DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  27. O’Neil, T., and Cammack, D. (2014). Fragmented governance and local service delivery in Malawi. Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Report.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Saito, F. (1999) Decentralisation in Uganda: Challenges for the 21st Century, Copenhagen: DANIDA.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Sarmistha, P. and Zaki, W. (2017). Fiscal decentralisation, local institutions and public good provision: evidence from Indonesia, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45, (2), 383-409Google Scholar ↗
  30. Siddle, A. & Koelble, T. A. (2016). Local government in South Africa: Can the objectives of the developmental state be achieved through the current model of decentralised governance? Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy. Research Report Number 7Google Scholar ↗
  31. Sikander, T. (2015). A Theoretical Framework of Local Government. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 5, No. 6(1)Google Scholar ↗
  32. Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, Dimensions, Myths and Challenges. Public Administration and Development. Vol. 23, pp.7–16.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Schneider, N. (2019). Decentralization: an incomplete ambition, Journal of Cultural Economy, 12:4, pp.265-285.Google Scholar ↗
  34. Sow, M. and Razafimahefa, F, I. (2015). Fiscal Decentralization and the Efficiency of Public Service Delivery. International Monetary Fund. WP/15/59Google Scholar ↗
  35. Steiner, S. (2006). Decentralisation in Uganda: Exploring the Constraints for Poverty Reduction. GIGA Research Programme: Transformation in the Process of Globalisation. Working Paper. GIGA-WP-31, pp.1-27Google Scholar ↗
  36. Tshukudu, T. T. (2014). Decentralization as a Strategy for improving Service delivery in the Botswana Public Service Sector. Journal of Public Administration and Governance ISSN 2161-7104 2014, Vol. 4, No. 2Google Scholar ↗
  37. Wild, L., Chambers, V., King, M. and Harris, D. (2012). Common constraints and incentive problems in service delivery. Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Working Paper 351Google Scholar ↗
  38. Zhou, G. & Chilunjika, A. (2013). The Challenges of Self-Financing in Local Authorities: The Case of Zimbabwe. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 11Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Moffat Tembo
Copperbelt University, Directorate of Distance Education and Open Learning, Kitwe - Zambia
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Erastus Misheng’u Mwanaumo
👤 View Profile →