ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Engineering and Computer Science
Open Access

Intelligent Auto-Scaling in AWS: Machine Learning Approaches for Predictive Resource Allocation

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v10i10.ec06· Pages: 999-1005· Vol. 10, No. 10, (2022)· Published: October 30, 2022
PDF
Views: 744 PDF downloads: 503

Abstract

The deployment of intelligent auto-scaling solutions across the cloud environment simultaneously decreases the operational spend as well as distribute resources effectively. The research investigates the deployment of predictive auto-scaling with machine learning in Amazon Web Services (AWS) to improve system scalability as well as management efficiency and economical resource usage. The proposed system implements advanced ML algorithms to reach 92% prediction accuracy thus it minimizes scaling latency and optimizes resource utilization. Analysis reveals that ML-based approaches exceed threshold-based methods because they provide superior response times as well as reduced costs and maximum system availability. Performance evaluations with cost analysis reveal that predictive resource allocation has great future potential for cloud infrastructure management. The discovery demonstrates how ML-based auto-scaling creates a perfect solution for modern cloud challenges by uniting cost-saving measures with high scalability and efficiency benefitsIndependent Researcher

Keywords

Intelligent Auto-ScalingPredictive Resource AllocationAWSMachine LearningCloud

References

  1. Aslanpour, M. S., Gill, S. S., & Toosi, A. N. (2020). Performance Evaluation Metrics for Cloud, Fog and Edge Computing: A Review, Taxonomy, Benchmarks and Standards for Future Research. Internet of Things, 12, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100273DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Naveen Kodakandla, “Optimizing Kubernetes for Edge Computing: Challenges and Innovative Solutions,” IRE Journals, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 210–221, Apr. 2021, Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Naveen-Kodakandla/publication/386877301Google Scholar ↗
  3. Barakabitze, A. A., Ahmad, A., Hines, A., & Mijumbi, R. (2019). 5G Network Slicing using SDN and NFV: A Survey of Taxonomy, Architectures and Future Challenges. Computer Networks, 167, 106984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106984DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Distributed denial of service attacks in cloud: State-of-the-art of scientific and commercial solutions. Computer Science Review, 39, 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100332DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  5. Costa, R. L. de C., Moreira, J., Pintor, P., dos Santos, V., & Lifschitz, S. (2021). Data-driven Performance Tuning for Big Data Analytics Platforms. Big Data Research, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2021.100206DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Naveen Kodakandla, “Serverless Architectures: A Comparative Study of Performance, Scalability, and Cost in Cloud-native Applications,” IRE Journals, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 136–150, Aug. 2021, Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Naveen-Kodakandla/publication/386876894Google Scholar ↗
  7. Huang, D., & Wu, H. (2018). Mobile Cloud Computing Taxonomy. 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809641-3.00002-8DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Jauro, F., Chiroma, H., Gital, A. Y., Almutairi, M., Abdulhamid, S. M., & Abawajy, J. H. (2020). Deep learning architectures in emerging cloud computing architectures: Recent development, challenges and next research trend. Applied Soft Computing, 96, 106582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106582DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  9. Lohachab, A., Lohachab, A., & Jangra, A. (2020). A comprehensive survey of prominent cryptographic aspects for securing communication in post-quantum IoT networks. Internet of Things, 9, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100174DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Marinescu, D. C. (2016). Computer Clouds. Elsevier EBooks, 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804041-6.00004-9DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Marinescu, D. C. (2018). Cloud Resource Management and Scheduling. Elsevier EBooks, 321–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-812810-7.00012-1DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Molligan, J., Stapp, R., Patel, M., London, J., Goswami, C., Evans, J., & Peiper, S. (2017). Pathology Informatics Summit 2017. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 8(1), 26–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2153-3539(22)00430-8DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Peddi, S. V. B., Kuhad, P., Yassine, A., Pouladzadeh, P., Shirmohammadi, S., & Shirehjini, A. A. N. (2017). An intelligent cloud-based data processing broker for mobile e-health multimedia applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 66, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.03.019DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Ravi, K., Khandelwal, Y., Krishna, B. S., & Ravi, V. (2018). Analytics in/for cloud-an interdependence: A review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 102, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.11.006DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Ray, P. P., & Kumar, N. (2021). SDN/NFV architectures for edge-cloud oriented IoT: A systematic review. Computer Communications, 169, 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.01.018DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  16. Salhab, N., Langar, R., & Rahim, R. (2021). 5G network slices resource orchestration using Machine Learning techniques. Computer Networks, 188, 107829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107829DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. Singh, A. K., Firoz, N., Tripathi, A., Singh, K. K., Choudhary, P., & Prem Chand Vashist. (2020). Internet of Things: from hype to reality. Elsevier EBooks, 191–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-821326-1.00007-3DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Syed, H. J., Gani, A., Ahmad, R. W., Khan, M. K., & Ahmed, A. I. A. (2017). Cloud monitoring: A review, taxonomy, and open research issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 98, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.08.021DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  19. Tahaei, H., Afifi, F., Asemi, A., Zaki, F., & Anuar, N. B. (2020). The rise of traffic classification in IoT networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 154, 102538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102538DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Taherizadeh, S., Jones, A. C., Taylor, I., Zhao, Z., & Stankovski, V. (2018). Monitoring self-adaptive applications within edge computing frameworks: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Systems and Software, 136, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.10.033DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Tavana, M., Hajipour, V., & Oveisi, S. (2020). IoT-based Enterprise Resource Planning: Challenges, Open Issues, Applications, Architecture, and Future Research Directions. Internet of Things, 11(1), 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100262DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  22. Aslanpour, M. S., Gill, S. S., & Toosi, A. N. (2020). Performance evaluation metrics for cloud, fog and edge computing: A review, taxonomy, benchmarks and standards for future research. Internet of Things, 12, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100273DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  23. Barakabitze, A. A., Ahmad, A., Mijumbi, R., & Hines, A. (2019). 5G network slicing using SDN and NFV: A survey of taxonomy, architectures and future challenges. Computer Networks, 167, 106984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106984DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  24. Tong, W., Hussain, A., Bo, W. X., & Maharjan, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Vehicle-to-Everything: a survey. IEEE Access, 7, 10823–10843. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2891073DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  25. Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020). Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(2), 869–904. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2020.2970550DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  26. Zhu, G., Liu, D., Du, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., & Huang, K. (2020). Toward an intelligent edge: wireless communication meets machine learning. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.001.1900103DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  27. M. Stoyanova, Y. Nikoloudakis, S. Panagiotakis, E. Pallis, and E. K. Markakis, “A Survey on the Internet of Things (IoT) Forensics: Challenges, Approaches and Open Issues,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–1, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2962586DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  28. M. Stoyanova, Y. Nikoloudakis, S. Panagiotakis, E. Pallis, and E. K. Markakis, “A Survey on the Internet of Things (IoT) Forensics: Challenges, Approaches and Open Issues,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–1, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2962586DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  29. F. Liu, G. Tang, Y. Li, Z. Cai, X. Zhang, and T. Zhou, “A Survey on Edge Computing Systems and Tools,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1537–1562, Aug. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2920341DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  30. A. A. Barakabitze, A. Ahmad, A. Hines, and R. Mijumbi, “5G Network Slicing using SDN and NFV: A Survey of Taxonomy, Architectures and Future Challenges,” Computer Networks, vol. 167, p. 106984, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106984DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Ravi Chandra Thota
Independent Researcher
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →