Abstract
This research aims to analyze problem and to design procedure in administrative service in Ngebel Sub District Office of Ponorogo Regency. This research was conducted through interview, observation, and documentation. Informant as the data source of research is internal informant (service provider) and external informant (service user). The method used in deciding the data source was purposive sampling method. The result of research showed that based on the result of fishbone/cause-effect and value added analyses on administrative service held, some classical problems were still found. The administrative service procedure analyzed had Value Added Ratio of 86.36% and thereby needed improvement. The problems existing need business process reengineering on administrative service in order to support the achievement of objective, an effective and efficient administrative service. The analysis of the business process reengineering result using Business Impact Analysis showed 21 positive and 8 negative values, and thereby this result is feasible to be implemented further.
Keywords
References
- Brennan, C., and A.Douglas. 2002.Complaints Procedures in Local Government : Informing Your Customers. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 219-236.Google Scholar ↗
- Davenport, Thomas. 1993. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work ThroughInformation Technology. Boston,Massachusetts,US : Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Dumas, Marlon, Marcello LaRosa, JanMendling, and Hajo A. Reijers. 2018. Fundamentals of Business Process Management (2d ed). Berlin : Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH & CoGoogle Scholar ↗
- Gandy, R.,A. Franci, C. Gurrieri, and B. McClelland. 2011. Demonstrating Access to Public Services Diagrammatically.International Journal of Public Administration. 34: 516–527Google Scholar ↗
- Hammer, Michael., and JamesChampy. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York, US:Harper Collins PublishersGoogle Scholar ↗
- Jacka, J. Mike., and Paulette J. Keller. 2009. Business Process Mapping : Improvement Customer Satisfaction Second Edition. New Jersey US : John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar ↗
- Li, Zhigang., Fengyue Yang. 2016. The Government Information Model based on GPR. Journal Chengdu University of Technology. Procedia Computer Science. 91, 193-200Google Scholar ↗
- Manganelli, Raymond L., and Mark M. Klein. 1994. The Reengineering Handbook. Newyork, US : AmacomGoogle Scholar ↗
- Ming, Anthony., Omer Awan, and Naveed Somani. 2013. E-Governance in Small State. London, UK : Commonwealth SecretariatGoogle Scholar ↗
- Moenir, HAS.1992. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi AksaraGoogle Scholar ↗
- National Institute for Smart Government. 2012. Governance Capacity Buliding : Government Process Reengineering. Government of India : Department of Electronics and Information TechnologyGoogle Scholar ↗
- Ratminto, dan Atik Septi Winarsih. 2006. Manajemen Pelayanan. Jakarta: Pustaka PelajarGoogle Scholar ↗
- Sabaruddin,Abdul.2015. Manajemen Kolaborasi dalam Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha IlmuGoogle Scholar ↗
- Schumacher, Wolf D. 1997. Managing Barriers to Business Reengineering Success. Munich : GRIN VerlagGoogle Scholar ↗
- Tan, C. W., and S. LPan.2003. Managing E-Transformation in The Public Sector; an E-Government Study of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269–281. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000479DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Vakola, Maria., and Yacine Rezgui. 2000. Criticts of Existing Business Process Reengineering Methodologies. Business Process Management Journal, 6,3,239Google Scholar ↗
- WeerakkodyV., M. Janssen, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2011.Transformational Change and Business Process Reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch Public Sector. Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 320– 328Google Scholar ↗