Abstract
Aiming at the uncertainty between the evaluation samples and the evaluation standards in the evaluation of water environment carrying capacity, a five-element connection coefficient evaluation model for water environment carrying capacity based on the set pair analysis theory is constructed, and the partial connection coefficient method and the subtractive set pair potential method are used. The development trend of the water environment carrying state was analyzed, and the method was used in the dynamic evaluation of the water environment carrying capacity in HJ City. The results show that the water environment carrying capacity of HJ city in 2015-2021 is between grades IV and III, and the water environment carrying capacity is poor, but the overall potential is developing from partial antipodal to homogeneous, showing a development trend for the better. According to the comprehensive index evaluation results, targeted suggestions for improving the water environment carrying capacity are put forward. From the analysis, it can be seen that the above dynamic evaluation and analysis results are reasonable and reliable, and the method is intuitive and simple, which can provide a reference basis for the improvement of regional water environment quality.
Keywords
References
- Wang Fuqiang, Li Xin, Zhao Heng, Yang Dongming. Assessment of regional water environment carrying capacity based on water environment capacity and comprehensive index system [J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Hydropower (Natural Science Edition), 2021,42 (02): 24-31Google Scholar ↗
- Song W, Pang Y. Research on narrow and generalized water environment carrying capacity, economic benefit of Lake Okeechobee, USA[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2021, 173: 106420.Google Scholar ↗
- Wang Nianqin, Pu Kaichao, Li Renwei. Comprehensive evaluation of geological environment bearing capacity of Lintong District based on variation coefficient method [J]. Groundwater, 2018, 40 (02): 77-80.Google Scholar ↗
- Li Jiao, Yan Dingrong. Research on Water Environment Bearing Capacity of Key Cities in Hunan Province and Dongting Lake District [J]. Economic Geography, 2013, 33 (10): 157-162Google Scholar ↗
- Jiang Xiaohui, Huang Qiang, Huiyanghe, et al. Study on Water Environment Bearing Capacity in Guanzhong Region of Shaanxi Province [J] Journal of Environmental Science, 2001,21 (3): 6.Google Scholar ↗
- Zhao Chuanqi, Zhu Yue, Wang Liusuo, et al. Evaluation of water environment carrying capacity of Liangzi river basin based on system dynamics and vector modulus method [J]. Science of Environmental Protection, 2021,47 (01): 136-142.Google Scholar ↗
- Zheng Zhihong, Yu Yanxu. Application of a dynamic comprehensive evaluation method in the assessment of water environment carrying capacity [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Technology, 2016,47 (10): 54-57Google Scholar ↗
- Cheng Yang, Yao Jian. Evaluation of Water Environment Carrying Capacity in Sichuan Province Based on Improved Set Pair Analysis Model [J]. Renmin Changjiang River, 2021,52 (05): 24-29Google Scholar ↗
- Chen Wenting, Xia Qing, Su Jing, Zheng Mingxia, Xi Beidou, Xiang Wei. Early warning of water environment carrying capacity assessment of Baiyangdian watershed based on time difference correlation analysis and fuzzy neural network [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2022,40 (06): 261-271Google Scholar ↗
- Wang Bin, Wang Xi. Comprehensive assessment of resource and environment carrying capacity in karst areas -- taking Guizhou as an example [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2022,37 (01): 118-124Google Scholar ↗
- Liu Zhiming, Zhou Zhaohong, Wang Yongqiang, et al. Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Regional Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Sustainable Development [J]. Renmin Changjiang River, 2019, 50 (03): 145-150Google Scholar ↗
- Su Meirong, Yang Zhifeng, Chen Bin. Set pair analysis of urban ecosystem health based on emergy vitality index [J]. China Environmental Science, 2009, 29 (08): 892-896Google Scholar ↗
- Wang Wensheng, Jin Juliang, Ding Jing, et al. A new method for systematic evaluation of water resources -- set pair evaluation method [J]. Chinese Science (Part E: Technical Science), 2009, 39 (09): 1529-1534Google Scholar ↗
- Yuan, S. man ., & Li, F. xiu . Recognition criteria and application of lake eutrophication evaluation based on set pair analysis. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 2020,8(8), 405–413.Google Scholar ↗
- Deng Xue, Li Jiaming, Zeng Haojian, et al. Analysis of weight calculation method of analytic hierarchy process and its application [J] Practice and Understanding of Mathematics, 2012,24 (7): 8Google Scholar ↗
- Liu Qianqian, Chen Yan. Assessment of vulnerability of watershed water resources based on entropy weight method -- taking the Huaihe River basin as an example [J]. Journal of the Yangtze River Academy of Sciences, 2016,33 (09): 10-17Google Scholar ↗
- Cheng Qiansheng. Attribute recognition theoretical model and its application [J]. Journal of Peking University: Natural Science Edition, 1997 (01): 14-22Google Scholar ↗
- Zhao Keqin. Partial connection coefficient [C] Proceedings of the 11th National Academic Annual Meeting of the Chinese Association of Artificial Intelligence (II). 2005:884-886Google Scholar ↗
- Yang Hongmei, Zhao Keqin. Calculation and application of partial connection coefficient Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2019, 14 (5): 865-876Google Scholar ↗
- Hu Qiling, Dong Zengchuan, Yang Yanfei, et al. Water resources carrying capacity state evaluation model based on contact number [J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47 (05): 425-432Google Scholar ↗
- Jin Juliang, Chen Pengfei, Zhang Haoyu, et al. Five Yuan Subtraction Set Pair Potential and Its Application in the Trend Analysis of Water Resources Carrying Capacity [J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Hydropower (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 41 (02): 30-35+42Google Scholar ↗