ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

Measuring Systemic Risk in Vietnam's Banking System

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i06.em02· Pages: 9166-9177· Vol. 13, No. 06, (2025)· Published: June 3, 2025
PDF
Views: 820 PDF downloads: 542

Abstract

In the context of globalization and increasing economic integration, systemic risk in the banking sector has emerged as a critical threat to the stability of modern economies, particularly in emerging markets like Vietnam. This study focuses on applying the CoVaR (Conditional Value-at-Risk) index to measure systemic risk in Vietnam's commercial banking system, a method chosen for its ability to capture spillover effects and market volatility during periods of financial instability. Utilizing daily stock price data from 18 listed commercial banks between 2015 and 2024, the research provides new empirical evidence on their systemic risk contributions. The findings reveal distinct phases of systemic risk, with a notable increase during the 2022 period, and identify specific institutions with higher contributions to systemic risk. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the academic literature by providing empirical evidence on systemic risk using CoVaR in an emerging market context. From a practical standpoint, it offers evidence-based policy recommendations to enhance systemic risk monitoring and mitigation, particularly for identifying systemically important institutions, thereby supporting targeted supervision and the establishment of appropriate capital and liquidity requirements. These findings aim to bridge the gap between theory and practice in systemic risk management in Vietnam and provide a foundation for regulators to develop more effective control measures.

Keywords

systemic riskbanking systemVietnamCoVaRemerging marketsfinancial risk management 1

References

  1. Acharya, V.V., Pedersen, L.H., Philippon, T. and Richardson, M., 2017. Measuring systemic risk. The review of financial studies, 30(1), pp.2-47Google Scholar ↗
  2. Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M. (2011). Covar.. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17454DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M.K., 2016. CoVaR. The American Economic Review, 106(7), p.1705Google Scholar ↗
  4. Ahmad, G., Rizwan, M., & Ashraf, D. (2021). Systemic risk and macroeconomic forecasting: a globally applicable copula‐based approach. Journal of Forecasting, 40(8), 1420-1443. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2774DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  5. Bernoit, S., Colliard, J.E., Hurlin, C. and Pérignon, C., 2017. Where the risks lie: A survey on systemic risk. Review of Finance, 21(1), pp.109-152.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Biagini, F., Fouque, J., Frittelli, M., & Meyer‐Brandis, T. (2018). A unified approach to systemic risk measures via acceptance sets. Mathematical Finance, 29(1), 329-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12170DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  7. Biagini, F., Fouque, J., Frittelli, M., & Meyer‐Brandis, T. (2020). On fairness of systemic risk measures. Finance and Stochastics, 24(2), 513-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-020-00417-4DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Brøgger, A. and Cokayne, G. (2018). Regulatory cliff effects and systemic risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301344DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  9. Chen, Y., Hu, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Too connected to fail? evidence from a chinese financial risk spillover network. China & World Economy, 28(6), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12357DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Cimini, G., Squartini, T., Garlaschelli, D., & Gabrielli, A. (2015). Systemic risk analysis on reconstructed economic and financial networks. Scientific Reports, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15758DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Dastkhan, H. and Gharneh, N. (2016). Determination of systemically important companies with cross-shareholding network analysis: a case study from an emerging market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 4(3), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs4030013DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Dhaene, J., Laeven, R., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Systemic risk: conditional distortion risk measures.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1901.04689DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Ellis, S., Sharma, S., & Brzeszczyński, J. (2022). Systemic risk measures and regulatory challenges. Journal of Financial Stability, 61, 100960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100960DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Feng, Y., Min, M., & Fouque, J. (2022). Deep learning for systemic risk measures.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2207.00739DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Hochrainer‐Stigler, S., Pflug, G., Dieckmann, U., Rovenskaya, E., Thurner, S., Poledna, S., … & Brännström, Å. (2018). Integrating systemic risk and risk analysis using copulas. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 9(4), 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0198-1DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  16. Hoffmann, H., Meyer‐Brandis, T., & Svindland, G. (2018). Strongly consistent multivariate conditional risk measures. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 12(3), 413-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-017-0210-3DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. Hüser, A. (2015). Too interconnected to fail: a survey of the interbank networks literature. The Journal of Network Theory in Finance, 1(3), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.21314/jntf.2015.001DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Meuleman, E. and Vander Vennet, R., 2020, Macroprudential policy and bank systemic risk, Journal of Financial Stability, 47, p.100724Google Scholar ↗
  19. Poledna, S. and Thurner, S. (2016). Elimination of systemic risk in financial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax. Quantitative Finance, 16(10), 1599-1613. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2016.1156146DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Serguieva, A. (2014). Systemic risk identification, modelling, analysis, and monitoring: an integrated approach., viii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1109/cifer.2014.6924043DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Xuemin, R., Yuan, G., & Jiang, L. (2014). The framework of systemic risk related to contagion, recovery rate and capital requirement in an interbank network. Journal of Financial Engineering, 01(01), 1450004. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345768614500044DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  22. Yalla, S., Bhattacharyya, S., & Jain, K. (2018). Impact of regulatory announcements on systemic risk in the indian telecom sector. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 1395-1416. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-08-2017-0307DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  23. Ye, X. and Douady, R. (2018). Systemic risk indicators based on nonlinear polymodel. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(1), 2.https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12010002DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Hoang Bao Ngoc
Trade Union University, Hanoi
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Le Mai Phuong
Trade Union University, Hanoi
👤 View Profile →