ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

The Effect of Leverage and Managerial Ownership on Company Risk Using Derivative Instruments as Moderating Variables

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v14i01.em04· Pages: 10211-10222· Vol. 14, No. 01, (2026)· Published: January 9, 2026
PDF
Views: 621 PDF downloads: 231

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of leverage, managerial ownership and use of derivatives on corporate risk of manufacturing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange IDX.. This research was conducted using a quantitative approach. The population in this study are all manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling method. The companies included in the sample of this study are manufacturing companies that use derivative instruments and are always listed on the IDX from 2022 to 2024. A total of 12 companies can be used as final samples in this study. Based on the results of regression analysis and mediation test, it can be concluded that the leverage variable has a negative effect oncompany risk, the managerial ownership variable has a significant positive effect on the Usage of Derivative Instruments. The variable Usage of Derivative Instruments has a significant negative effect on company risk. The Usage of Derivative Instruments is able to mediate the relationship between managerial ownership and corporate risk.

Keywords

Leverage Managerial OwnershipDerivative InstrumentsCompany Risk

References

  1. Bartram, S. M., Brown, G. W., & Conrad, J. S. (2009). The Effects of Derivatives on FirmGoogle Scholar ↗
  2. Risk and Value. Ssrn, 46(4), 967–999. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1342771DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Beaver, W., Kettler, P., & Scholes, M. (1970). The Association Between Market DeterminedGoogle Scholar ↗
  4. and Accounting Determined Risk Measures. The Accounting Review, 45(4), 654–682.Google Scholar ↗
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/244204Google Scholar ↗
  6. Biase, P. di, & D‘Apolito, E. (2012). The Determinants of Systematic Risk in the ItalianGoogle Scholar ↗
  7. Banking System: A Cross-Sectional Time Series Analysis. International Journal ofGoogle Scholar ↗
  8. Economics and Finance, 4(11), 152–164. https://doi.org/ 10.5539/ijef.v4n11p152DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  9. Borokhovich, K. A., Brunarski, K. R., & Simkins, B. J. (2004). Board Composition andGoogle Scholar ↗
  10. Corporate Use Of Interest Rate Derivatives. The Journal of Financial Research, 27(2),Google Scholar ↗
  11. 216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2004.t01-1-00079.xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting onGoogle Scholar ↗
  13. antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(C), 267–291.Google Scholar ↗
  14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90047-5DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Carter, D.A., Sinkey Jr, J. F. (1998). The Use of Interest Rate Derivatives by End-users: TheGoogle Scholar ↗
  16. Case of Large Community Banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 14, 17–34Google Scholar ↗
  17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008057418368DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Chen, C. R., Steiner, T. L., & Whyte, A. M. (1998). Risk-taking behavior and managementGoogle Scholar ↗
  19. ownership in depository institutions. Journal of Financial Research, 21(1), 1–16.Google Scholar ↗
  20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.1998.tb00266.xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Chun, L.S., & Ramasamy, M. (1999). Accounting variabel as Determinants of SystematicGoogle Scholar ↗
  22. Risk in Malaysian Common Stocks, Asian Pasific Journal of Management, 6(2), 339-Google Scholar ↗
  23. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01733773Google Scholar ↗
  24. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). Simple of Tobin ’ s Approximation q. Venture Capital,Google Scholar ↗
  25. 23(3), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  26. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. A. N. R. & Cannella, A.A. (2003). Introduction To SpecialGoogle Scholar ↗
  27. Topic Forum Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data. Academy OíGoogle Scholar ↗
  28. Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  29. Elloumi, F., & Gueyie, J. (2001). Financial Distress and Corporate Governance: an empiricalGoogle Scholar ↗
  30. analysis. Corporate Governance, 1(1), 15-23.Google Scholar ↗
  31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700110389548DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  32. Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D.S. & Stein, J.C. (1993). Risk Management : CoordinatingGoogle Scholar ↗
  33. Corporate Investment and Financing Policies. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1629-Google Scholar ↗
  34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  35. Gatopoulos, G., & Loubergé, H. (2013). Combined use of foreign debt and currencyGoogle Scholar ↗
  36. derivatives under the threat of currency crises: The case of Latin American firms.Google Scholar ↗
  37. Journal of International Money and Finance, 35, 54–75.Google Scholar ↗
  38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.01 .004DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  39. Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang:Google Scholar ↗
  40. Universitas Diponegoro.Google Scholar ↗
  41. Guay, W. R. (1999). The impact of derivatives on firm risk: An empirical examination of new derivative users. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–3), 319–351.Google Scholar ↗
  42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00032-9DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  43. Gujarati, D.N. (2011). Econometrics By Example. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar ↗
  44. Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial LeastGoogle Scholar ↗
  45. Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: SAGEGoogle Scholar ↗
  46. Publication, Inc.Google Scholar ↗
  47. Hanafi, M. (2014). Manajemen Risiko.Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.Google Scholar ↗
  48. Hardwick, P., & Adams, M. (1999). The determinants of financial derivatives use in theGoogle Scholar ↗
  49. United Kingdom life insurance industry. Abacus, 35(2), 163–184.Google Scholar ↗
  50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00039DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  51. Horne, J. C. V., & Warchowicz, J. M. (2008). Fundamentals of Financial Management.Google Scholar ↗
  52. England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar ↗
  53. Hull, J. (2009). Options, Futures, and other Derivatives. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar ↗
  54. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.Google Scholar ↗
  55. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2937665Google Scholar ↗
  56. Lantara, I. W. (2010). A Survey on the Use of Derivatives in Indonesia. Gajah MadaGoogle Scholar ↗
  57. International Journal of Business, 12(3), 295–323.Google Scholar ↗
  58. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5504DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  59. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital. The AmericanGoogle Scholar ↗
  60. Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809167Google Scholar ↗
  61. Muspa, M. (2018). Kinerja Keuangan dan Umur Perusahaan Sebagai Faktor Penentu Tingkat Underpricing Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Melakukan Initial Public Offering. Jurnal Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 7(1). STIE Nobel Indonesia, Vol. 7. No. 1, pg. 73-84. https://e-jurnal.nobel.ac.id/index.php/jbk/article/view/169Google Scholar ↗
  62. Osuoha J. (2013). Financial Engineering, Corporate Governance and Nigeria EconomicGoogle Scholar ↗
  63. Development. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 2(4), 61-66. https://doi.org/Google Scholar ↗
  64. 4236/jfrm.2013.24010Google Scholar ↗
  65. Salhi, B., & Boujelbene, Y. (2012). Students and Entrepreneurship: Effect of the Training.Google Scholar ↗
  66. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, (3)5, 19-34.Google Scholar ↗
  67. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=33741.Google Scholar ↗
  68. Saunders, A., & Cornett, M. (2014). Financial Institution Management/ : A Risk ManagementGoogle Scholar ↗
  69. Approach. New York: Mc Graw Hill.Google Scholar ↗
  70. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhil, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students.Google Scholar ↗
  71. Italy: Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar ↗
  72. Smith, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (1985). The Determinants of Firms’ Hedging Policies. JournalGoogle Scholar ↗
  73. of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), 391-405.Google Scholar ↗
  74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330757DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  75. Solimun. (2010). Analisis Variabel Moderasi Dan Mediasi. Malang: Program Studi StatistikaGoogle Scholar ↗
  76. FMIPA-UB.Google Scholar ↗
  77. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.Google Scholar ↗
  78. Tufano, P. (1996), Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk ManagementGoogle Scholar ↗
  79. Practices in the Gold Mining Industry. The Journal of Finance, 51, 1097-1137.Google Scholar ↗
  80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04064.xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  81. Zhang, H. (2009). Effect of Derivative Accounting Rules on Corporate Risk-ManagementGoogle Scholar ↗
  82. Behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 47, 244-264.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Muspa Muspa
Nitro Institute of Business and Finance, Makassar, Indonesia
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →