Abstract
Conceptual framework brings all aspects of a study together through a process that explicates their connections and the contexts shaping a research setting as well as the study of the phenomena in that setting. It gives a theoretical meaning to what is contained in the main text of the study. The aim of this study was to understand challenges faced by postgraduate students in the application of conceptual frameworks in their researches. The study was informed by a case study and interpretivist paradigm. Participants were made up of four lecturers and twenty postgraduate students. The study findings suggest that students did not understand what the conceptual framework was really about such that, even those who had some ideas could not precisely apply it. This situation was partly attributed to poor understanding by supervising lecturers and lack of prioritization in teaching conceptual frameworks during learning process as well as lack of interactive supportive materials. The study further revealed that students did not substantively review literature to understand their research area that would eventually help them develop shrewd conceptual framework. It was also found that many students who purported to use conceptual framework failed to explain and relate it to methods and findings. Premised on the study findings, the study says that, postgraduate candidates lacked explicit and cohesive understanding of the relationships among concepts throughout the research process, they instead focused on the methods whilst overlooking the conceptual framework. The problem with application of conceptual framework was not only on trainees, but also on the trainers both of whose defensive arguments tended to be projected towards the opposite party. This therefore calls for a critical individual reflection and reflexivity on both parties and to ensure a co-engaged way of teaching and learning that is transformatively hands-on from the onset. The study proposes a framework that can generally enhance effective teaching of complex topics in research methodology courses at all academic levels.
References
- Becker, H. S. (2007). Writing for social scientists: How to start and finish your thesis, book, or article. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Evans, M. (2007). Recent research into applied linguistics and languages teaching with specific reference to 12 French. Language teaching 40, 211-230.Google Scholar ↗
- Gribble, D. (2022). Experiential Learning. https://www.idenetwork.org/index.php/about/what-is-democratic-education (accessed 2Google Scholar ↗
- Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. New York: Sage publications.Google Scholar ↗
- Hornby, G. (2005). Counseling in schools: Skills and strategies for teachers. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar ↗
- Imenda, S. (2014). Is There a Conceptual Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks. J Soc Sci 38(2), 185-195.Google Scholar ↗
- Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(4).Google Scholar ↗
- Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.htmlGoogle Scholar ↗
- Leshem, S. (2007) . A Case of a Doctoral Programme. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 44, 3, 287-299Google Scholar ↗
- Leshem, S. & Trafford, V. N. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Educational and Teaching International, 44(1), 93–105Google Scholar ↗
- Liehr, P. & Smith, M. J. (1999). Middle Range Theory: Spinning Research and Practice to Create Knowledge for the new Millennium. Advancing in Nursing Science 21(4), 81-91.Google Scholar ↗
- Lopez, S.J. & Louis, M.C. (2009). The Principles of Strengths-Based Education, Journal of College and Character, 10:4, , DOI: 10.2202/1940-1639.1041DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Lotz-Sisitka, H., Fien, J. & Ketlhoilwe, M. (2013). "Traditions and New Niches: An Overview of Environmental Research" In Stevenson, R., Brody, M. Dillon, J. and Wals, A. (eds.) Hand Book of Research on Environmental Education. New York: Routeledge.Google Scholar ↗
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication, Inc.Google Scholar ↗
- Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar ↗
- Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sources book 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar ↗
- Muchanga, M. (2020). Reflexive Debate on Use of Philosophy in Scientific Research. IJHSSE. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v7-i6/22.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
- Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2017). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar ↗
- Ravitch, S.M. and Riggan, M. (2012). Reason & rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research. London: SageGoogle Scholar ↗
- Smyth, R. (2004). Exploring the usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research tool: A researcher’s reflections. Issues in Educational Research. 14, 167-180.Google Scholar ↗
- Yin, R.K. (2004). Research and application: Design and methods( 6th ed). New York: Los AngelesGoogle Scholar ↗