Abstract
This article explores the relevance and application of Epicurean philosophy to modern pursuits of happiness and well-being. Despite the profound differences between ancient and contemporary societies, Epicurus' principles—centered on simplicity, moderation, and the pursuit of natural pleasures—offer valuable insights for addressing the stresses and complexities of modern life. The philosophy challenges the consumerist ethos and the relentless chase for material success, advocating instead for a life of balance, mental tranquility, and meaningful relationships. Through a detailed comparison with other well-being theories, such as Hedonism, Desire Satisfaction Theory, and Objective List Theory, this article highlights the unique contributions of Epicurean thought to the discourse on happiness. It also discusses the practical challenges of implementing these ideas in a world driven by external pressures and deeply ingrained habits. By providing a philosophical framework for reassessing desires and fostering authentic connections, Epicureanism remains a relevant guide for achieving long-term well-being in the contemporary context. The conclusion underscores that while aligning with these principles demands effort and adaptability, the potential for greater life satisfaction and personal fulfillment is significant.
Keywords
References
- Cooper J M. Pursuits of Wisdom - Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. UK: Princeton University Press; 2012Google Scholar ↗
- Long A A. Hellenistic Philosophy – Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics (2nd Edi.). USA: Berkeley Publications; 1985.Google Scholar ↗
- Laertius D. Lives of Eminent Philosophers – Volume II. UK: G.P.Putnam’s Sons; 1925.Google Scholar ↗
- Mitsis P. Epicurus and Epicureanism (Edi.). USA: Oxford University Press; 2020.Google Scholar ↗
- Robitzsch J M. Why Epicurean happiness is not for everyone. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 2024; 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2024.2338214DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Shields C. Ancient Philosophy a Contemporary Introduction. USA: Routledge Publications; 2012.Google Scholar ↗
- Rosenbaum S E. Epicurus on Pleasure and the Complete Life. Monist, 1990; 73(1): 21–41. https://doi:10.5840/monist199073116DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Adamson P. Philosophy in the Hellenistic and Roman worlds. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar ↗
- Nemeth A. Epicurus on the Self. UK: Routledge Publications; 2017.Google Scholar ↗
- Seneca L A. Letters from A Stoic. USA: Routledge Publications; 2018.Google Scholar ↗
- Smith B. Healthy and Happy Natural Being: Spinoza and Epicurus Contra the Stoics. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 2024; 11(16): 412-441.Google Scholar ↗
- Voorhoeve A. VIII—Epicurus on Pleasure, a Complete Life, and Death: A Defense, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, (2018); 118(3): 225–253, https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy018DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Medeiros R. The Fundamental Books of Epicurus Principal Doctrines, Vatican Sayings, and Letters. England: Epicurean Publications; 2021.Google Scholar ↗
- O’Keefe T. Epicureanism. USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.Google Scholar ↗
- Erler M. Epicurus – An Introduction to His Practical Ethics and Politics. Switzerland: Schwabe Verlag Publishers; 2020.Google Scholar ↗
- Hicks R D. Stoic and Epicurean. UK: Dover Publications, Inc; 2019.Google Scholar ↗
- Kahneman D, Diener E, & Schwarz N. (Eds.). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. England: Russell Sage Foundation; 2003.Google Scholar ↗
- Heathwood C. Desire satisfaction theory. In G. Fletcher (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being (pp. 135-146). USA: Routledge Publications; 2015.Google Scholar ↗
- Fletcher G. The Philosophy of Well-being: An Introduction. USA: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar ↗
- Hadot P. What is Ancient Philosophy. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2002.Google Scholar ↗